Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic (band)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP: 9k, 3d. -Splash 01:11, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Galactic (band)

I'm unable to find a significant reason why this band should be listed, other than the fact they make original music. They haven't really been part of any musical milestones. Scaryrobot 13:57, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. Gwk 03:46, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Since when are only artists involved in "musical milestones" listed on Wikipedia? Granted, this article should be expanded, but by no means deleted. Galactic is a well known band, even to a casual listener of funk such as myself. They have a significant AllMusic.com entry and 859,000 google results (for Galactic+band), many of which are CD and concert reviews in major media sources. royblumy 06:19, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
Keep as meeting Wikimusic project guidelines. Their Allmusic.com entry shows five albums most released on major labels or significant independent labels, most of which have made the Billboard contemporary jazz charts. According to Allmusic.com, they have also supported significant artists such as The Meters, Maceo Parker and Medeski, Martin and Wood see [1].Capitalistroadster 06:32, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete borderline notable at best. JamesBurns 09:51, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As per Capitalistroadster's research, the band satisfies the WikiProject Music notability and music guidelines. Scaryrobot, contrary to your edit history comment you can explain the significance. (If the editor who had tagged your article had used the {{music-importance}} tag, you would have known this sooner.) Take a look at the guidelines and please add a discography to your article. Keep. Uncle G 11:31, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep jamesgibbon 12:13, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Five albums meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. Cyclone49 12:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Capitalistroadster. --TheMidnighters 12:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe that this article satisfies the WikiProject Music notability and music guidelines --jonasaurus 20:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Touring nationally satisfies guidelines. siafu 22:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. quite notable, especially in the jam-band circuit. Dystopos 05:17, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Mocheeze 07:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.