User talk:Michael Shields
Hello Michael, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Angela 03:40, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
Hi. I removed the second link to Gutzon Borglum from Mount Rushmore National Memorial, because one link is enough. (I should have perhaps said so in my summary). Note also that Gutzon Borglum was newly created. Secondly, I removed the italics in the "See also:" section because of Wikipedia:Manual of Style. You just made me notice that boilerplate text and manual of style are contradictory - I'll announce it on the village pump and we'll agree on a standard. Thanks, snoyes 22:16, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?
[edit]It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup.
- Eric 29 June 2005 01:27 (UTC)
WikiProject Cycling
[edit]I've noticed you've made more than a few edits to cycling-related articles. I've created WikiProject on Cycling. Please come and join us in building up Wikipedia's articles relating to bicycles, cycling, and bicycle racing. --Christopherlin 05:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Camouflage Peer Review
[edit]Hello, you once edited Camouflage. You might be interested to know, this article has been nominated for peer peer review. novacatz 03:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Threadless-bicycle-headset.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Threadless-bicycle-headset.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
- I am the copyright holder. I'll add an appropriate tag. —Michael Shields 03:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
|
You contributed to the Science Collaboration of the Month that has just ended its run. Thanks, and let's keep improving it so it may become a Featured Article! |
- Samsara contrib talk 12:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
In response to your question about "Zip Code" as a postal service trademark. The reason Coca Cola and Bass Ale are still trademarks is the owners of those marks have complied with use and renewal requirements.
When one registers a trademark, one is required to send a notice of continued use after a certain period of time after the initial registration, I think it's 4 or 5 years. If the notice is not sent, the Patent & Trademark office presumes the mark has been abandoned and automatically cancels the registration. Then, presuming a registrant complies with this, 20 years after the initial registration, if it is not renewed, the PTO presumes the mark has been abandoned and, you guessed it, automatically cancels the registration for failure to pay maintenance fees. Then, if it is renewed, the owner must renew it again in 20 years.
As long as the owner keeps renewing every 20 years the mark will remain "live" and the registration will remain in force. The postal service failed to comply with the rules (or decided it wasn't necessary) and their registration was cancelled.
So now you know why the Postal Service no longer has a registration in "Zip Code" while the other companies do. This sort of mistake is easy to make, the Washington Post company forgot to renew their trademark on the name of the newspaper, and had to re-register. Only problem is now you don't get an exclusive right in the name of a city as part of your mark any more, so the term "Washington Post" is not protected, only "Post" in combination with it; while it's only a technical difference it means the mark is somewhat "weaker" than it would have been had they not allowed their registration to lapse.
Propose deletion of DayJet
[edit]I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article DayJet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:DayJet. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.
Hello, An article that I created as a part of Wikiproject Cycling called Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais. Thank you, Bob in Las Vegas - uriel8 (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AboveNet logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:AboveNet logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AboveNet logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:AboveNet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Kramerbooks & Afterwords for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kramerbooks & Afterwords is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kramerbooks & Afterwords until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Michael Shields. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Michael Shields. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)