User talk:Tpkunesh

Welcome!

Hello, Tpkunesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Alai 05:15, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"a notion that i think is highly suspect"

Not so much "highly suspect" as just a nuisance — that article has been created and deleted several times already as a "Self-published internet movie with no assertion of notability whatsoever, no reliable sources, no mainstream media attention, etc". See the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie. / edg ☺ ★ 22:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lots of self-published stuff that's gotten dissed (eg, Leaves of grass). i think it still behooves a thing that calls itself an encyclopedia to be able to show what it is when a person looks for it -- like i wanted when it first appeared in emails & i wanted to know what it is. good golly, the thing that's supposed to know everything about everything has banned knowing about something. good to know it's survived the test of time. tpk (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Order of Odd Fellows

A while back (11:03, 6 October 2007) you added to the IOOF page with the comment "added info on the common OF symbol - the three-link chain and initials F.L.T."

It is indeed a "common OF symbol", but I've never heard it referred to as "the three-link chain". In South Australia, it is referred to as the "Triple Links".

Have you ever heard of the expression, the "Triple Links"?

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Triple Links

not technically "heard it" (am not a member & don't know any) but have seen it - read it, and added it. my experience is from seeing them on gravemarkers in cemeteries all over the US, and at the entrance of one lodge here in Chattanooga. "three-link chain" is how some folks refer to it around here, esp. when they're new to cemetery iconics. thanks for the addition. ;>

re: List of unrecognized tribes in the United States edits

I believe you are making these edits in good faith, however I have to disagree with the assessment that the "geographic" location of an editor should really be what's pertinent here. If I'm understanding your argument correctly, you're challenging the placement of some of the referenced material in the article based on your own personal observations, without offering any supporting reliable references to support your conclusions. I'd suggest that if you really want to move ahead in this situation, please provide other editors with some reliable sources to support what you're contending, without them, in my opinion you're engaged in WP:OR. If you're attempting to challenge the validity or appropriateness of the source(s) currently being used to support the inclusion of material, please provide other editors with your reasoning for disputing their usefulness. Also, please do not continue to remove material from the article until consensus regarding the issue has been reached here on the article talk page. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 04:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reordering a dab page

Hi Tpkunesh. I hope you don't mind in this edit I reordered the First Unitarian Church disambiguation page back to geographic order (i.e. in the U.S. by state then city). This is the ordering that is applied in many dab pages of places listed on the National Register that I and others have developed (Smith House, First Presbyterian Church, Auburn Public Library, thousands more). These also include other, non-NRHP-listed places of the same name. Geographic order seems to make sense for readers and is allowed and has been discussed previously. Readers are likely to be looking for the place that is near to them, in their state, and can do the lookup easily. But if the same-state items are far away from each other because of alphabetical sorting and minor differences in punctuation, they could fail to find the one of interest to them; geographic order seems to work well for lists of places. Happy to discuss if you like; i'll watch here and should see any reply. But please contact me if I don't. I noticed you made other improvement to the dab page, too, thanks. Keep up your good work. Sincerely, --do ncr am 06:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i don't mind at all - as long as i understand the method to what i previously took as madness. ;) tpk (talk) 14:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications (September 18)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anup Mehra ^✈ 10:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications was accepted

Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NPOLITICIAN. Candidates are not automatically considered notable; winners sometimes are.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tpkunesh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

added Citico (Hamilton County, Tennessee)

Demographic profiles

Hello, Tpkunesh. I noticed that you adjusted the demographic profile at Chattanooga, Tennessee#Demographics. But your changes were based on an incorrect reading of the data. Under the US Census Bureau's definitions, "Hispanic/Latino" is a cultural designation that is applied regardless of race. I've undone your changes to that article and, later today, I'll undo the similar changes you made to the article on Cannon Ball, South Dakota. But if you've made similar changes to other articles, you'll want to undo those, as well. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein has been accepted

Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of place names of Native American origin in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Natchez and Tuscarora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Spotted Elk, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]