User talk:Tonderai
Hello Tonderai welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Usefull links (if you didnt get to them already): Wikipedia:How does one edit a page, manual of style, Wikipedia:Sandbox, Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump or my talk page. Cheers, Muriel Gottrop
- Thanks. Actually I've used Wikipedia for a while now and decided to give some input. Its amazing coming back to well-known sections and seeing how much they've progressed. See you around, Tonderai
Welcome Tondarai. I see you are interested in phytoplankton and maybe other oceanography and water quality topics. Look forward to your contributions and improvements to our efforts here - Marshman 17:09, 29 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- Yes. Oceanography's my degree so I'll hopefully be able to bring some of that up to speed. Actually whole disciplines of oceanography don't yet exist. Good to see some other water babies here ;) I'm new to the style here though, so if you have any suggestions they'd be welcome Tonderai 17:17, 29 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Hi Tondarai, a short comment/suggestion about the thermohaline ciculation article. In the opening paragraph you mention the atlantic waters moving north and ending up in the ne pacific which, "then flows downhill into the deep water basins, only resurfacing in the NE Pacific 1200 years later.". What about the Strait of Magellan don't waters mix there. The Antartic is surely a masive water mixer from what i've read about the winds and currents. It can't all go through the north atlantic?? sunja 14:57, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Is Thermohaline about just the cold water currents or all currents?, if the later i would make that clear in the opening paragraph.sunja 10:22, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Hi Sunja, sorry I've been away for a while. You are quite right that a lot of mixing goes on in the Southern Ocean: this article needs quite a bit more work. I'll look at it asap. Thermohaline is about the density-driven circulation: this is generally in operation all over the ocean, but in many cases other forces (such as wind) are dominant e.g in the surface ocean. Tonderai 18:00, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Copy Vio Sidney Coleman
[edit]Why blank the whole page on put a copy-vio notice for one paragraph??? It would have taken all of 2 minutes to re-write the paragraph, or move the offending paragraph to the talk page so at least some of the perfectly valid article remains.
- Jackliddle 19:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I thought it was necessary to flag these things up so that repeated copyvios can be dealt with. Having reread Wikipedia:Copyright problems, however: Pages where the most recent edit is a copyright violation, but the previous article was not, should not be deleted. They should be reverted. The original does remain at Sidney_Coleman/Temp, but you are right - this was overzealous. Sorry, my mistake. Tonderai 19:25, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Carbon Rationing Action Groups, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Carbon Rationing Action Groups and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mjroots (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)