Talk:Brockhaus Enzyklopädie

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Initial comments

Is this the largest contemporary German encyclopedia? Links to any other Wikipedia articles about current German encyclopedias would be welcome. Gillian Tipson 14:15, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is the largest (at least for the next few months until the German WP reaches 260,000 articles). Other big German-language encyclopedia are Microsoft Encarta with 50,000 articles and Meyers Konversations-Lexikon with about 150,000. -- Marcika 13:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Then we should mention that it's the largest. Will do so right now. --OpenToppedBus - Talk 13:46, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

I've just deleted the text about Meyers and Encarta. If there is an article about German encyclopaedias, the text should go there. Here it is of no use to the topic. -- Goldie (tell me) 10:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Per WP:USEENGLISH. This ain't it.

More specifically, per Ngram, the English and German forms of the name are roughly equally used and both are less common than referring to it as "Brockhaus" (i.e., Brockhaus (encyclopedia)). Since this page forms the natural disambiguation that uses English, this is where the page should go. — $Llywelyn II$ 12:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ngram doesn't enter into it. It's a proper name, with no ambiguity about it - you see it right on the picture. "Brockhaus encyclopedia" (lowercase, and certainly without italics) is a possible descriptive term, but not one to use as a title. Unless a book has an actual translation, you can't just translate the title yourself and use it as if it were the proper name. Mewulwe (talk) 12:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brockhaus Enzyklopädie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214174204/http://www.ftd.de/technik/medien_internet/%3ABrockhaus%20Internet/316489.html to http://ftd.de/technik/medien_internet/%3ABrockhaus%20Internet/316489.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]