Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/September 11, 2001 attacks/archive1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Inappropriate comments
To Dr Zen, jguk and Everyking: I find some of your comments to be irrelevant and unproductive. I ask you to confine your comments to the topic at hand. If you disagree with anything I do, that is fine. To criticize me because we disagree is not fine. Maurreen 05:46, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- If you are not told that others find your conduct unsatisfactory, how can you know, Maurreen? I genuinely don't feel it's a decent reason for voting against a featured article.Dr Zen 06:39, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Regardless of that, you accused me of selectively choosing sources. Maurreen 06:47, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I said you selectively gave them. You did not note any that did not agree with you. Are you suggesting that all sources that give an opinion agree with you?Dr Zen 06:58, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You assume that I chose them selectively. Even if you suspect I did so, you could have raised the issue in a more productive manner. Look, we've both given our thoughts on this, why don't we close it now? Maurreen 07:10, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Don't tell me what I assume. I said you gave them selectively. I'm happy to close it. It was not worth your bringing up in the first place, because the comment you made could only be calculated to cause conflict.Dr Zen 23:07, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You assume that I chose them selectively. Even if you suspect I did so, you could have raised the issue in a more productive manner. Look, we've both given our thoughts on this, why don't we close it now? Maurreen 07:10, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)