User talk:GavinZac

Gavin James Golden

Cork City FC GavinGolden.com General Mayhem

SpeakOut

All that is required is that you add links from reliable sources that verify the assertions made in the article.--RWR8189 21:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ColinHealy.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:ColinHealy.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 23:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CorkCityFC

Gav. Hi. I notice that you changed the lead section of the CCFC article citing WP convention. It is not WP convention to have a one-line intro. Per Wikipedia:Lead section:

"The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and briefly describing its notable controversies, if there are any. It should be between one and four paragraphs long, should be carefully sourced as appropriate, and should be written in a clear and accessible style so that the reader is encouraged to read the rest of the article."

I have reverted your change. Cheers. Guliolopez 17:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

→ Ok, I pretty much havent read guidelines, just observed other articles :) I think the content is more relevant than trivia such as the current manager or chairman, so i've used the same text, a little slimlined, as the introduction. --GavinZac 10:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that some of the linked names to the Cobh players are in fact links to quite different people. (e.g James McCarthy comes up as a 65 year old US Bishop, Ken Coleman as a deceased US broadcaster, Kevin Murray as an Aussie footballer or IRA man (take your pick), John Kearney as a sculptor, Sean Daly as a US rapper and Michael O'Shea as a Canadian (american football) footballer). If you are creating links to people you need to check that a person of the same name doesn't already have an entry. If they do you need to create a disambiguate page such as [[Joe Bloggs (Irish footballer)]]. Coolavokig 20:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Arkagalogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkagalogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Courtenay_Cameron_paper.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Courtenay_Cameron_paper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SOScreenshot.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SOScreenshot.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Irish Football

Time to get this kick started again.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello GavinZac! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Cillian Lordan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sean Kelly (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Massimo Carrera - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ais.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ais.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cork city players

Thanks for the message, I understand your thoughts. As a football fan like you, I hope he makes league appearances as soon as possible to avoid any possible argument about players that have yet to make an appearance in the first team. Like I said to Joseph McSweeney, since the deletion tag has been removed, I would keep the page and give him the time to rise so that his article could be "more important". Same thing for Kalen Spillane. Regards Joaquin008 (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cork City F.C. squad

Template:Cork City F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Echetus Xe 18:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ray Lally

The article Ray Lally has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP. No suggestion made that he meets the GNG, aside from the fact that a few bigger clubs were interested when he was a teenager.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —W F C— 09:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neal Horgan

The article Neal Horgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer. To merit a standalone article, he or she must meet the criteria stated at WP:NFOOTBALL , or the general notability guideline. This player passes neither of them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Life^talk 13:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colin O'Brien

The article Colin O'Brien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 12:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Events happening in Dublin

Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 22:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SpeakOut! (Be Heard) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SpeakOut! (Be Heard) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpeakOut! (Be Heard) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SpeakOutEventJuly21st.gif

Thanks for uploading File:SpeakOutEventJuly21st.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]