Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abercrombie Kids
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:21, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
Page is obviously poorly written advertising. Unless someone can fill it with useful information, it should probably be deleted. Doozer 04:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as soon as possible. What a horrible article. Aecis 10:47, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete page is obviously satire, but it does not belong on Wikipedia 80.202.222.90 15:44, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If somebody can write a valid article about this notable store, then I would vote keep, but if the article stays as it currently does, then I vote delete. RickK 18:50, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- There's already a good article on Abercrombie & Fitch Co., or is "Abercrombie Kids" a separate new offshoot? Oy vey if so. Moncrief 05:33, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete terrible POV trash. DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:34, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just dreadful in every possible way. Moncrief 22:21, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It's satire &/or parody--even clever at that--but the writer can consider submission to The Onion instead. GeeZee 22:58, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant advertisement; alternative, merge into Parody as example. (No, please don't.) Kelly Martin 04:54, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- advertisement. - Longhair | Talk 10:22, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.