Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique Consequence

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 17:52, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Unique Consequence

This makes no sense. It's a weird rantish tract. Katefan0 23:51, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- though I think "babblish" would be a better adjective than "rantish". --Christofurio 00:14, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

Delete this nonsense rant babble. Bart133 (t) 02:32, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Delete either as very original research or as babblish, rantish, nonsensical codswallop. HyperZonk 16:39, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

Delete, I was gonna say rant, I guess it is a rant-babble. Wyss 19:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delete patent nonsense. Johntex 21:41, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sadly, it's not a speedy, wish it was, it should be. Wyss 13:47, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Delete Chamaeleon 19:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.