Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarface: The World is Yours
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 20:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Completing VfD - never listed - no vote--Doc (?) 13:40, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
One person's view on an unreleased video game. When details come out and an actual article can be produced, then something can be written. Harro5 02:52, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- I second that. This videogame is set to release in 2006. By then, a proper article should be written. Jute
- Nuke it. This is not a neutral descriptive article, it is a speculative pre-review. yalbik
- Nuke it unless someone heavily rewrites it; there are certainly enough articles out there on the game to write a full preview (and don't tell me Wikipedia takes an exception to previews). Bobquest3
- More info has surfaced on the game. It just needs a cleanup. This article just has poor quality. Besides, aren't there a bunch of article on games in prodtuction here? Keaton
- Delete, as unverifiable and non-notable, unless convincing mainstream references are produced to show that a) something about the preparation for the game's release is notable now, and b) the article is rewritten to include only information that is verifiable now. For example, a properly sourced, verifiable quotation from one of the game designers saying "we are designing the game according to thus-and-such storyline" is a verifiable fact in the present. Currently the article does not present any such facts. Once the unverifiable speculation and unsourced assertions are removed from the article, nothing is left. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dpbsmith. And no, there aren't "a bunch" of articles on not-yet-released games. There should be none at all. Denni☯ 23:35, 2005 September 4 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.