Talk:Inside Information (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which came first?

The article needs to tell which one came first: this album or Lou Gramm's solo album Ready Or Not. Gringo300 (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 December 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 03:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inside Information (album) → Inside Information – It has redirected there for 2 years; if Inside Information (disambiguation) is to be moved there, it should be using RM instead. – 189.225.27.154 (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makes more sense to move the dab to baseline. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with IIO. There are 4 other competing topics on the dab page without even considering Insider trading. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose for the reasons above, per my comment recorded when contesting the technical request. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for reasons stated. It would be helpful if editors could conduct Google searches etc on titles before making wild claims re primary. GregKaye ✍♪ 18:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. If there's a primary topic here, it would probably be the concept of non-public information that the DAB places in the context of insider trading on significance grounds. Either way, the primary topic position shouldn't be pointing here. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.