Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nzinga Malika Adams Jones

Vanity by new user. Dunc_Harris|☺ 16:41, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Of the worst kind. Someone give this chick a noogie for not following the BOLD FACE instructions regarding vanity pages. Delete. Please. - Lucky 6.9 16:43, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Vanity. Delete. DJ Clayworth 20:45, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Straight up vanity. At least this one looks like an encyclopedia article and not like some of the junk people try to post about themselves. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:26, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Not vanity. anthony (see warning)
I think Cyr and anthony are saying the same thing here. I hope we start up a m:Wikifamily project soon, so there will be a place for articles like this. +sj + 18:43, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Actually what I'm saying is that we should keep these articles here, because they're not harming anything. anthony (see warning)
Delete, vanity. Are you serious, Anthony? This is one of the most straightforward vanity articles I've ever seen. —Stormie 04:25, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem like vanity to me. This is useful historical information. Needs to be wikied, but that's a job for cleanup. anthony (see warning)
Delete. --Gary D 08:53, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Let her register and move this to her User page. JamesMLane 06:46, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. -- pne 11:28, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Comment: Yo, Anthony...this site is adding one server per month to keep up with the demand. This would be fine in a "Wikifamily" project as suggested. Why take up space with a person that is totally non-notable? This is not, IMO, "useful historical information." - Lucky 6.9 18:23, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- there is no connection between needing extra servers and space - we are not short of disc space - disc space is cheap. Secretlondon 22:58, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete - vanity - Tεx τ urε 22:23, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)