Talk:Communicative language teaching
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): C e jones, Mtsharpe, Krismarl, Abond77.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Critiques of CLT
[edit]It's great to have citation, but the first paragraph is dramatically uninformative. What do I care if a sequence of people attacked and defended CLT if I haven't the faintest clue what it is they said? 76.6.173.2 13:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
How can we improve the page on Communicative language teaching?
I'm not sure 'context' and 'notion' are synonymous in the functional-notional tradition, as the article suggests. Something like 'shopping' was usually called a 'situation', not a 'notion'. 'Notion' was used to describe semantic domains, rather than places in the real world - for example 'weight', 'price', 'colour', 'texture'.
== Criticisms of CLT ==
Recent critiques of CLT include an article by Stephen Bax entitled: "The end of CLT: a Context Approach to language teaching" in which he argues that the dominance of CLT has led to the neglect of one crucial aspect of language pedagogy, namely the context in which that pedagogy takes place. Bax argues that it is time to replace CLT as the central paradigm in language teaching with a Context Approach which places context at the heart of the profession. The article argues that such a shift is taking place already and will eventually change our practice radically.
This was published alongside an interesting response by Jeremy Harmer.
References:
Bax, S (2003) The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching ELT J 2003 57: 278-287
Harmer, J. (2003) Popular culture, methods, and context ELT J 2003 57: 288-294
--> I think this should be added to the article!
thanks!
What exactly is the "interesting response" by Harmer? Doesn't CLT address context in the classroom? What is this radical change that is not specified? Absent these answers, I don't believe this is a substantive criticism. Roehl Sybing 17:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
A further search for this article reveals that the above summary is taken directly from the abstract of the article. Nothing particularly original here. Roehl Sybing 17:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree entirely that it's great to have a link to a critique of CLT but this article tells us nothing about what those critiques actually were/are. 194.125.23.211 (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
picture
[edit]It might be nice to have a picture of someone teaching in a CLT classroom.
examples of CLT in the classroom
[edit]I think some examples of common activities would help
What kind of examples, lesson plans, samples of material or clearer description of how certain activities go?Ikwilhetweten 22:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
References
[edit]there should be more about communicative methodology !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.248.92.198 (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Major english
[edit]What is language 27.34.17.201 (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Major english class 12
[edit]What is pidgin 27.34.17.201 (talk) 14:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2022 and 3 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sethmast (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sethmast (talk) 03:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)