Talk:Free Spirit Alliance

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Primary Sources tag

As this is the first time I've seen such a tag, I'll have to read up on the guidelines before modifying the article. I ask that you bear with myself and any other editors a little while. "Free Spirit Aliance" alone does get 1,340 Google hits, and I may have to skim a lot of them to find quality references.

I can attest that FSA exists, as I personally attended the Beltane festival. It will just take a little time to fulfill this requirement properly. Simesa (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The primary criterion listed at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) will assist you what types of sources are acceptable. -- Longhair\^talk 02:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the helpful starting point is appreciated. Simesa (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought then that this would be a simple task. Well, "Free Spirit Alliance" now gets 25,700 Google hits, but I've begun digging again to find a news article - and they're elusive so far. Part of the problem is that these people (of which I'm one) don't proselytize, nor do they advertise their festivals. I'll keep looking this month. Simesa (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Sexuality Beltane

The text for this article currently states that the Sacred Sexuality Beltane "is the only festival of its type in the country." That statement may have been true several years ago, but I think it's out of date now. The calendar of events at www.templeredlotus.com lists several other events which may be similar.Folklore1 (talk) 01:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fires of Venus

The text of the article states that FSA "...sponsors a September event named Fires of Venus." That is false. Fires of Venus is not sponsored by the Free Spirit Alliance (FSA) in any way - it is solely owned and operated by Turtle Hill Events Inc (THE). FSA contracts with THE for registration services and customer service prior to, and at, their own event, Free Spirit Gathering (FSG). Grebmorts75 (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grebmorts75 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Free Spirit Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]