Talk:Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

05/03/05

I did a significant rewrite for several reasons: the links were expired or bad, the syntax needed cleaning up, the quotes needed referencing, added stub & category. The article needs some fleshing out.--ghost 04:19, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

06/23/05

This article emphasizes impeaching Justice Kennedy, but that was really just a small part of the meeting. It needs to be more balanced.

I added a bit more. The group's website is a good resource, although most of the press was related to the Kennedy incident. Dave (talk) 15:01, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Moved unsourced text here

Moved unsourced text here. Please do not add back without source.

Recent media reports have placed this organization within what has been labelled a "dominionist movement". This does not seem to be an accurate description and most right-wing Christian conservatives are not only unaware of the dominionist position, but are also opposed to it. FloNight ^talk 20:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Past tensing

A newspapers.com search showed no mention of this group since 2005. The URL is dead. There is no sign of any life that I can find for nigh on two decades. I am taking the bold move of past-tensing this... perhaps a necessary move, as it is making claims about living people (such as "current chariman") that cannot reasonably be supported. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 23:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]