Jump to content

Talk:Casualties of the September 11 attacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name before Occupation?

[edit]

In the WTC subsection of the Fatalities section, the name list starting with Bill Biggart and ending with Dan Trant is gramatically incorrect and needs to be flipped around to Occupation -> Name and separated with commas. 2600:8800:1383:7900:C5D9:E133:560E:C899 (talk) 04:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2023

[edit]

You can not “lose a pregnancy” to “pre born babies lost their lives” 2A02:8084:6181:3A00:450:8B95:5F96:14D7 (talk) 05:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. The original version works better . Kpgjhpjm 06:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not lose a Pregnancy. It's murdered in the Womb by terrorist action. wiki wimps will not change it because of the abortion lovers crowd . 2600:1015:A000:8DA6:CD08:67A2:37AD:CBF8 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revise the foreign casualties list?

[edit]

There are multiple unsourced or incorrect statistics here. For example, there's a single Georgian citizen listed as a casualty, but it is not corroborated by any sources I've searched. Might need to take a look into this 176.221.207.244 (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2023

[edit]

Change footprintt to footprint in the image caption "September 11 Memorial fountain at the footprintt of where one of the towers once stood, and the associated museum at left." No Chickenbro (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cannolis (talk) 23:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2023

[edit]

On line: On the other hand, pocket utility knives with a blade less than four inches in length were not prohibited

remove word not R6inhardt (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: From the cited source: One of the checkpoint supervisors working at Logan International Airport on September 11, 2001, recalled that as of that day, while box cutters were not permitted to pass through the checkpoint without the removal of the blade, any knife with a blade of less than four inches was permitted to pass through security. Tollens (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Harbor attack surpassed as an act of terrorism.

[edit]

The deaths at Pearl Harbor a total of 2,403 innocent victims by terrorists from Japan on December 7,1941 was surpassed by the terrorist attack on 9/11 with 2,977. Pearl Harbor was an act of terrorism as no declaration of war was sent by the terrorists from Japan who declared war hours after the attack started. 2600:1015:A026:D971:D080:1D64:A4EF:A7C9 (talk) 13:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What change did you want made to the article? Richard-of-Earth (talk) 15:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously for the article to say the 9/11 attacks causing the deaths of 2,977 Americans became the no 1 Terror attack surpassing The Japanese terror attack of December 7,1941 killing 2,403 Americans an attack before a declaration of war was issued by the government of Japan. One of the main reasons why the U.S. Military was taken by complete surprise. 2600:1015:A011:E0DA:1954:9ADC:7963:9E2 (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@2600:1015:A011:E0DA:1954:9ADC:7963:9E2 The article Attack on Pearl Harbor and the article Japanese war crimes do not refer to the attack as a terrorist attack. If you get those articles change to refer to it as a terrorist attack, then maybe we will do so here. Do you have a citation that shows it is broadly perceived as a terrorist attack? Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They don't need to. Any strike against a country without a declaration of war is considered a terror attack. 2600:1015:A011:E0DA:1954:9ADC:7963:9E2 (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What no response? or you can't respond to facts? 2600:1015:A011:E0DA:4931:AAC3:111:BD28 (talk) 12:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just look a GA resolution 4960 of the United Nations (1994). it fits the actions of the Pearl harbor attack to a t. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1015:A011:E0DA:1954:9ADC:7963:9E2 (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, been too busy to even look at Wikipedia lately. See Wikipedia:Content forks#Point of view (POV) forks. We do not have a POV in one article that does not align with the POV presented in other articles, unless that article is about divergent views. You should comment at Talk:Attack on Pearl Harbor#Pearl Harbor is a terrorist act. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 05:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No need to GA resolution 4960 spells it out to a t. if you would have taken the time to read it you would know it. 2600:1015:A011:E0DA:4931:AAC3:111:BD28 (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Table listing foreign casualties

[edit]

There's an error and the table can't be seen unless you are editing it in source editing mode. Delectable1 (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024

[edit]

"List of the dead" table: Please change PricewaterhouseCoopers's death count from 4 to 5[1]. The unnamed employee in the cited article was Kelly Booms[2]. 47.185.126.205 (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, per your request. There are 3 articles which list the names of all of those that died alphabetically. As I posted above here the table can't be read because it is incorrectly formatted. I had to go into source editing mode to change the table as you asked. Delectable1 (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]