Talk:Bristol Pegasus

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Bristol Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal

I removed £oœ as the name of the PZL P.23. It doesn't look like it's rendering right, at least in an US-English browser. I suspect that someone was using a different character set when they entered that; someone should re-encode it in Unicode and put it right.

(it renders as 'pound-sign o oe-ligature' on my browser, which doesn't look like correct). —Morven 22:55, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

new image

PeterGrecian 14:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peter, I just used the top one for the infobox (2 1/2 years later!) . Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 17:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pegasus XC thrust?

While researching for an aircraft article Short Scylla I came across several different thrust values given for the Pegasus XC e.g.

920 hp / 686 kW

919 hp

910 hp / 680 kW

900 hp

660 hp / 492 kW

In the end I chose the last value because it came from the Imperial Airways site and I decided that the operator would know!

What look like a competent source ([1] www.oldengine.org) gives

HP(max)=790 hp and

HP(take off)=910 hp.

Can anyone help sort this one out? Many thanks! TraceyR 18:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a new reference to the specs section and altered the figures to match, should be straight now. Lumsden gives the following hp ratings for the Pegasus X: 960 for takeoff, 810/850 continuous climb, 875/915 max power (5 minutes) Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol Pegasus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509084946/http://www.walterengines.com/about-us/history.htm to http://www.walterengines.com/about-us/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]