Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epenthesis

Epenthesis was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep the article.

Dicdef, already moved to Wiktionary. — A.M. 00:50, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: already transwikied. Geogre 02:15, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, but it does show signs of having been there: it seems to switch gears twice without transitional statements. Geogre 15:54, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: this is a much better article than the one in Wiktionary --thewittyname 02:23, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: this has been expanded as of 02:20, 12 Nov 2004. Kappa 02:26, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Rewritten to something more than a dicdef. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 02:43, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep rewritten version. jni 08:59, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep in current form. Smerdis of Tlön 12:48, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. zoney ♣ talk 14:45, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep now. Paul August 20:04, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Now a good article. Andrewa 21:46, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Interesting, good article. Alphax (talk) 04:09, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Transwiki [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 06:21, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.