Talk:Boardman Township, Ohio

United States: Ohio / Ohio - Townships Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio - Townships task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

Boardman's status as an urban township should supercede its status as a Census-designated place [CDP] in the article. Rationale: Because urban townships are defined by the Ohio Revised Code as a unit of local government, and CDP's lack any such official definition by the State of Ohio, the designation "urban township" is more substantial than the CDP designation. -SwissCelt 17:19, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of a real clean-up

There are some massive problems with this article, I think, and though I have tried to make it more neutral, and removed some of the blatently POV descriptors, I still think that this article is due for a rewrite. I admit to being a little at a loss with what to write, but large sections of the article are vague and unecessary. I'll probably keep working on this, but anyone who knows more about Boardman--or lives there--might be better at it than me, since I haven't been editing long. --XkarlmagneX 05:04, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Youngstown & Poland

In many Ohio villages and cities, when land is annexed in neighboring townships, that land ceases to be a part of the township as it becomes a part of the annexing municipality. In other cases, the township and municipality have concurrent jurisdiction. In still other cases (Windham and Ravenna come to mind) no explicit act was made to transfer land away from the township's jurisdiction until it was so ordered by state officials. What is the status of the land annexed to Youngstown and Poland from Boardman Township? It's a minor point, to be sure, but it does affect the wording of the article. Thanks. -- JeffBillman (talk) 03:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

CLOSED

Agree to merging of article(s) as only input agrees with merge proposal. Proposer, Lukasbdarling or other interested editor should consider proceeding BOLDLY with a merger. Non-Administrative closure-- GenQuest ^"scribble" 13:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Formal request has been received to merge: Boardman, Ohio into Boardman Township, Mahoning County, Ohio; dated: 3 november 2020. Proposer's Rationale: US Census has approved making the Boardman CDP consistent with township boundaries. Additionally there is no cultural or governmental distinction between the CDP and the Township proper. Lukasbdarling (talk). Discuss below. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 16:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge – I support the merger. As someone from Boardman, I can verify that there is no cultural distinction between the CDP and the township. Also, if the Census Bureau is making the CDP consistent with the township boundaries, I see no reason for it to have a separate article. YoungstownToast (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.