Talk:mX (newspaper)

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Melbourne / Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal MX (newspaper) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source?

What's your source for saying that MX stands for Melbourne Express? I've heard that claimed, and wonder if it is correct, but I've never seen it documented anywhere. Philip J. Rayment 16:47, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

It doesn't stand for Melbourne Express. That was the name of a totally seperate newspaper. Somebody in the WWW 01:45, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I know that was the name of a totally separate newspaper, so News Ltd. couldn't use the same name, but it is still possible that 'MX' is an abbreviation of 'Melbourne Express'. To put it another way, perhaps New Ltd. wanted to call their paper Melbourne Express, but couldn't, so used a abbreviation of it instead? But I agree that without knowing that, it is better not to make a connection in the article, so I agree with the change you made. Philip J. Rayment 02:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Ironically, many copies of MX are left on Melbourne trains every day" - what's ironic about this? I might be missing something, but the "ironically" statement seems nonsensical. Cnwb 22:59, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I came to this talk page with the same question. --Pengo 22:23, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Somebody in the WWW has had enough time to answer this query, and hasn't, so it's time that it went. It might make some sense if MX discouraged wastefulness or something, but it didn't say that, and without such a point the sentence wa just useless trivia, so I removed the entire sentence. Philip J. Rayment 00:55, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The first paragraph doesn't seem right to me. It's not quite formal enough for wikipedia and seems almost like casual advertism or promotion.

and that when people have finished reading their copy, they can leave it on their seat in the train for the benefit of the next person to come along. This method of informal distribution has proved very effective for mX.

Anyone else think there's something wrong with that? -- Pauric (talk-contributions) 23:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and that when people have finished reading their copy, they can leave it on their seat in the train for the benefit of the next person to come along. Yes. Some do. The rest dump them en masse in bins at their destined train station. At the end of the night, these rubbish bins are full of MX newspapers. 07:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Is it correct to describe mX as having a right-wing political affiliation (in the infobox)? It barely reports on political stories that I've seen, and when it does there isn't much of an editorial viewpoint. 218.215.4.40 14:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mx logo.gif

Image:Mx logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

Copy-edited today, as requested. Tag now removed.thisisace 01:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added to format and included "content", focussing on the actual content orientation of the paper. Paul2886 10:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What MX meant

MX, I'm pretty certain though don't now have any document proof of this, was a reference to 'M-Train' and 'Connex', the two carriers of Melbourne trains at the time the paper launched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.253.155 (talk) 06:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what does it actually stand for?

Nobody seems to know.. Does it stand for anything? If it is Melbourne something, why isn't the Sydney edition called sX? Someone should ask someone who works for mX. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliko (talk • contribs) 15:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MX (newspaper). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151126054712/https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=au.com.ndm.mx&hl=en to https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=au.com.ndm.mx&hl=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]