Talk:Leptospermum

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Leptospermum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I had ever understood that the tea tree was Melaleuca rather than Leptospermum. The essential oil --- sometimes called cajeput --- is sold here as a sort of minor external antiseptic, and Melaleuca alternifolia is the usual name given. Has it been reclassified or assigned to a different genus? -- Smerdis of Tlön 07:34, 9 Sep 2003 (EDT)

No reclassification that I know of - just some ambiguity. (Where is Tlön?) "Tea tree" is a common name based on a function. Apparently there are two "tea trees" - one being Leptospermum, the other Melaleuca. Here is the US, where I live, "tea tree" always means Leptospermum. This is the convention of the Sunset Western Garden Book (which calls Melaleuca the "paperbark tree"). In Australia and New Zealand, either meaning is possible, and in aromatherapy, etc. it seems that the "tea tree" == Melaleuca meaning predominates. Where "tea tree" == Melaleuca, the term "manuka" is (sometimes) used for (some varieties of) Leptospermum.

Melaleuca and Leptospermum are somewhat similar in appearance, although according to Sunset again, Melaleuca also resembles "bottlebrush" and is sometimes called "bottlebrush", though more usually "bottlebrush" means Callistemon.

And I would imagine there is more than one genus called "paperbark tree". Sounds like time for some disambiguation with global sensitivity. : NuclearWinner 13:22, 9 Sep 2003 (EDT)

I'm also in the USA, although in a place where few myrtles or eucalypts grow. "Tea tree" is familiar to me most notably as the source of "tea tree oil," which I put on my feet after I go swimming to keep them clean. This is inevitably credited to Melaleuca. We do have a stub at Melaleuca, so perhaps it ought to be mentioned there.

BTW, Tlön refers to Jorge Luis Borges story Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius," the true secret history of the Wikipedia project. The "impostor Smerdis" figures there as well. -- Smerdis of Tlön 19:51, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)

The above comments are correct in essence ... er ... no pun intended. ;) It's still Leptospermum. Melaleucas are also very common in Australia though, and look rather similar. Common names don't really work very well with Australian flora (i.e., there is often not a 1:1 relationship between the plant genus and the usual common name) but generally speaking, melaleucas are called "paperbarks". The reality is that these days, the best-accepted common name for Melaleuca is "melaleuca". (The same could be said for quite a few others, by the way, though not Leptospermum.) Tea-tree is Leptospermum. Melaleucas are not tea-trees, nor are they bottlebrushes, they are paperbarks. The essential oil makers have it wrong, simple as that. However, the error is so well-established and so widespread that it needs to be mentioned in both articles. Tannin 23:37, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Leptospermum and melaleuca look similar (from a distance) until you see them flowering. Then you realize they're completely different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.162.17 (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a drink?

Were tea-tree leaves ever used in the early Colony of NSW as a substitute for 'real' tea? I am unable to find any evidence to substantiate this, and wonder if it is another 'Botany Bay Mirage', i.e. urban legend. This article http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page16606293 says the name is a misnomer, and the leaves no substitute for tea. This article http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page1488643 says that 'early navigators' used Leptospermum and Melaleuca infusions as antiscorbutics. Cook is elsewhere described as doing so, and a New Zealand species named. 121.44.219.123 (talk) 06:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leptospermum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110306093531/http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/journal/native-honey-a-sweet-antibacterial.htm to http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/journal/native-honey-a-sweet-antibacterial.htm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revised taxonomy

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tax.12892

Seems like last year Leptospermum was divided into 5 genera, Leptospermum, Gaudium, Leptospermopsis, Apectospermum, and Aggreflorum. I don't know what the process is for deleting and moving pages when this kind of thing happens.

Cheers. Kirokage (talk) 23:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]