Jump to content

Skyglow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about night sky luminance from artificial light. For the natural atmospheric phenomenon, see airglow. For the interplanetary phenomenon, see zodiacal light. For the wider environmental impacts of artificial light, see light pollution.
Mexico City at night, showing skyglow
A map from 1996 to 1997 showing the extent of skyglow over Europe

Skyglow (or sky glow) is the diffuse luminance of the night sky, apart from discrete light sources such as the Moon and visible individual stars. It is a commonly noticed aspect of light pollution. While usually referring to luminance arising from artificial lighting, skyglow may also involve any scattered light seen at night, including natural ones like starlight, zodiacal light, and airglow.[1][2]

In the context of light pollution, skyglow arises from the use of artificial light sources, including electrical (or rarely gas) lighting used for illumination and advertisement and from gas flares.[3] Light propagating into the atmosphere directly from upward-directed or incompletely shielded sources, or after reflection from the ground or other surfaces, is partially scattered back toward the ground, producing a diffuse glow that is visible from great distances. Skyglow from artificial lights is most often noticed as a glowing dome of light over cities and towns, yet is pervasive throughout the developed world.

Causes

[edit]
In this 10-second exposure, facing south toward Sagittarius, three forms of light pollution are present: skyglow, glare, and light trespass.

Light used for all purposes in the outdoor environment contributes to skyglow, by sometimes avoidable aspects such as poor shielding of fixtures, and through at least partially unavoidable aspects such as unshielded signage and reflection from intentionally illuminated surfaces. Some of this light is then scattered in the atmosphere back toward the ground by molecules and aerosols (see § Mechanism), and (if present) clouds, causing skyglow.

Research indicates that when viewed from nearby, about half of skyglow arises from direct upward emissions, and half from reflected, though the ratio varies depending on details of lighting fixtures and usage, and distance of the observation point from the light source.[4][5] In most communities, direct upward emission averages about 10–15%.[4] Fully shielded lighting (with no light emitted directly upward) decreases skyglow by about half when viewed nearby, but by much greater factors when viewed from a distance.

Skyglow is significantly amplified by the presence of snow, and within and near urban areas when clouds are present.[6] In remote areas, snow brightens the sky, but clouds make the sky darker.

In remote areas on moonless nights clouds appear dark against the sky. In or near developed areas skyglow is strongly enhanced by clouds.

Mechanism

[edit]

There are two kinds of light scattering that lead to sky glow: scattering from molecules such as N2 and O2 (called Rayleigh scattering), and that from aerosols, described by Mie theory. Rayleigh scattering is much stronger for short-wavelength (blue) light, while scattering from aerosols is less affected by wavelength. Rayleigh scattering makes the sky appear blue in the daytime; the more aerosols there are, the less blue or whiter the sky appears. In many areas, most particularly in urban areas, aerosol scattering dominates, due to the heavy aerosol loading caused by modern industrial activity, power generation, farming and transportation.

Despite the strong wavelength dependence of Rayleigh scattering, its effect on sky glow for real light sources is small. Though the shorter wavelengths suffer increased scattering, this increased scattering also gives rise to increased extinction: the effects approximately balance when the observation point is near the light source.[7]

For human visual perception of sky glow, generally the assumed context under discussions of sky glow, sources rich in shorter wavelengths produce brighter sky glow, but for a different reason (see § Dependence on light source).

Measurement

[edit]

Professional astronomers and light pollution researchers use various measures of luminous or radiant intensity per unit area, such as magnitudes per square arcsecond, watts per square meter per steradian,(nano-)Lamberts, or (micro-)candela per square meter.[8] All-sky maps of skyglow brightness are produced with professional-grade imaging cameras with CCD detectors and using stars as calibration sources.[9][10] Amateur astronomers have used the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale to approximately quantify skyglow ever since it was published in Sky & Telescope magazine in February 2001.[11] The scale rates the darkness of the night sky inhibited by skyglow with nine classes and provides a detailed description of each position on the scale. Amateurs also increasingly use Sky Quality Meters (SQM) that nominally measure in astronomical photometric units of visual (Johnson V) magnitudes per square arcsecond.[note 1]

A calibrated all-sky map in the vicinity of Ashurst Lake, Arizona, showing skyglow brightness, including artificial (Phoenix and Flagstaff, Arizona) and natural sources (airglow, Milky Way) are visible (U.S. National Park Service).

Dependence on distance from source

[edit]

Sky glow brightness arising from artificial light sources falls steeply with distance from the light source, due to the geometric effects characterized by an inverse square law in combination with atmospheric absorption. An approximate relation is given by

which is known as "Walker's Law."[13]

Walker's Law has been verified by observation[13][9] to describe both the measurements of sky brightness at any given point or direction in the sky caused by a light source (such as a city), as well as to integrated measures such as the brightness of the "light dome" over a city, or the integrated brightness of the entire night sky. At very large distances (over about 50 km) the brightness falls more rapidly, largely due to extinction and geometric effects caused by the curvature of the Earth.

Dependence on light source

[edit]
Sky glow and stars visible with high-pressure sodium lighting (top) and 4100K CCT LED lighting (bottom). Calibrated model of Flagstaff, Arizona, US as viewed from 10 km.

Different light sources produce differing amounts of visual sky glow. The dominant effect arises from the Purkinje shift, and not as commonly claimed from Rayleigh scattering of short wavelengths (see § Mechanism).[7][14] When observing the night sky, even from moderately light polluted areas, the eye becomes nearly or completely dark-adapted or scotopic. The scotopic eye is much more sensitive to blue and green light, and much less sensitive to yellow and red light, than the light-adapted or photopic eye. Predominantly because of this effect, white light sources such as metal halide, fluorescent, or white LED can produce as much as 3.3 times the visual sky glow brightness of the currently most-common high-pressure sodium lamp, and up to eight times the brightness of low-pressure sodium or amber Aluminium gallium indium phosphide LED.

Sky Glow brightness ratios for different lamp types[note 2]
Lamp type Description Sky glow
relative to LPS		 Sky glow
relative to HPS
LPS Low-pressure sodium 1.0 0.4
NBA-LED amber AlGaInP LED 1.0 0.4
HPS High-pressure sodium 2.4 1.0
PCA-LED Phosphor-converted amber LED 2.4 1.0
FLED[note 3] 5000K CCT LED with yellow filter 3.6 1.5
LED 2400K CCT Warm white LED 4.3 1.8
LED 3000K CCT Warm white LED 5.4 2.1
LED 4100K CCT Neutral white LED 6.4 2.7
LED 5100K CCT Cool white LED 7.9 3.3
Skyglow brightness ratio (compared to low-pressure sodium) vs. distance for various lamp types.[7]

In detail, the effects are complex, depending both on the distance from the source as well as the viewing direction in the night sky. But the basic results of recent research are unambiguous: assuming equal luminous flux (that is, equal amounts of visible light), and matched optical characteristics of the fixtures (particularly the amount of light allowed to radiate directly upward), white sources rich in shorter (blue and green) wavelengths produce dramatically greater sky glow than sources with little blue and green.[16] The effect of Rayleigh scattering on skyglow impacts of differing light source spectra is small.

Much discussion in the lighting industry and even by some dark-sky advocacy organizations (e.g. International Dark-Sky Association) of the sky glow consequences of replacing the currently prevalent high-pressure sodium roadway lighting systems with white LEDs neglects critical issues of human visual spectral sensitivity,[17] or focuses exclusively on white LED light sources, or focuses concerns narrowly on the blue portion (<500 nm) of the spectrum.[18][19] All of these deficiencies lead to the incorrect conclusion that increases in sky glow brightness arising from the change in light source spectrum are minimal, or that light-pollution regulations that limit the CCT of white LEDs to so-called "warm white" (i.e. CCT <4000K or 3500K) will prevent sky glow increases.[16] Improved efficiency (efficiency in distributing light onto the target area – such as the roadway – with diminished "waste" falling outside of the target area[20] and more uniform distribution patterns[citation needed]) can allow designers to lower lighting amounts.[citation needed] But efficiency improvement sufficient to overcome sky glow doubling or tripling arising from a switch to even warm-white LED from high-pressure sodium (or a 4–8x increase compared to low-pressure sodium) has not been demonstrated.

Negative effects

[edit]
Skyglow is mostly unpolarized, and its addition to moonlight results in a decreased polarization signal. Humans cannot perceive this pattern, but some arthropods can.

Skyglow, and more generally light pollution, has various negative effects: from aesthetic diminishment of the beauty of a star-filled sky, through energy and resources wasted in the production of excessive or uncontrolled lighting, to impacts on birds[21] and other biological systems,[22] including humans. Skyglow is a prime problem for astronomers, because it reduces contrast in the night sky to the extent where it may become impossible to see all but the brightest stars.[note 4]

Many nocturnal organisms are believed to navigate using the polarization signal of scattered moonlight.[24] Because skyglow is mostly unpolarized, it can swamp the weaker signal from the moon, making this type of navigation impossible.[25] Close to global coastal megacities (e.g. Tokyo, Shanghai), the natural illumination cycles provided by the moon in the marine environment are considerably disrupted by light pollution, with only nights around the full moon providing greater radiances, and over a given month lunar dosages may be a factor of 6 less than light pollution dosage.[26]

Due to skyglow, people who live in or near urban areas see thousands fewer stars than in an unpolluted sky, and commonly cannot see the Milky Way.[27] Fainter sights like the zodiacal light and Andromeda Galaxy are nearly impossible to discern even with telescopes.

Effects on the ecosystem

[edit]
Main article: Ecological light pollution

The effects of sky glow in relation to the ecosystem have been observed to be detrimental to a variety of organisms. The lives of plants and animals (especially those which are nocturnal) are affected as their natural environment becomes subjected to unnatural change. It can be assumed that the rate of human development technology exceeds the rate of non-human natural adaptability to their environment, therefore, organisms such as plants and animals are unable to keep up and can suffer as a consequence.[28]

Although sky glow can be the result of a natural occurrence, the presence of artificial sky glow has become a detrimental problem as urbanization continues to flourish. The effects of urbanization, commercialization, and consumerism are the result of human development; these developments in turn have ecological consequences. For example, lighted fishing fleets, offshore oil platforms, and cruise ships all bring the disruption of artificial night lighting to the world's oceans.[29]

As a whole, these effects derive from changes in orientation, disorientation, or misorientation, and attraction or repulsion from the altered light environment, which in turn may affect foraging, predator-prey dynamics,[30][31] reproduction,[32] migration, and communication. These changes can result in the death of some species such as certain migratory birds,[33] sea creatures,[34] and nocturnal predators.[35]

Besides the effect on animals, crops and trees are also susceptible to destruction. The constant exposure to light has an impact of the photosynthesis of a plant, as a plant needs a balance of both sun and darkness in order for it to survive. In turn, the effects of sky glow can affect production rates of agriculture, especially in farming areas that are close to large city centers.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ SQM meters have a notably different spectral response than the human eye, and even from the Johnson V response they nominally use. As a consequence SQM measures are not accurate for tracking visual impressions, particularly as spectral characteristics change from yellow sources such as HPS to white sources such as LED. Likewise, the difference between SQM measures and a true Johnson V measure is dependent on the skyglow spectrum and source(s) of artificial luminance.[12]
  2. ^ Results for within cities or near the light source, based on work of Luginbuhl et al.[7] and Aubé et al.[14]
  3. ^ As used on the Big Island of Hawai`i.[15]
  4. ^ It is a widely held misunderstanding that professional astronomical observatories can "filter out" certain wavelengths of light (such as that produced by low-pressure sodium). More accurately, by leaving large portions of the spectrum relatively unpolluted, the narrow-spectrum emission from low-pressure sodium lamps and to a lesser extent from amber direct emission Aluminium gallium indium phosphide LED allows more opportunity for astronomers to "work around" the resulting light pollution.[23] Even when such lighting is widely used, skyglow still interferes with astronomical research as well as everyone's ability to see a natural star-filled sky.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Roach, Franklin E. & Gordon, Janet L. (1973). The Light of the Night Sky. Dordrecht and Boston, Massachusetts: D. Reidel.
  2. ^ Flanders, Tony (December 5, 2008). "Rate Your Skyglow". Sky & Telescope. AAS Sky Publishing. Retrieved 2020-02-26.
  3. ^ Guerin, Emily (5 November 2015). "Oil Boom Means Sky Watchers Hoping for Starlight Just Get Stars, Lite". NPR. Retrieved 2016-04-24.
  4. ^ a b Luginbuhl, C.; Walker, C.; Wainscoat, R. (2009). "Lighting and Astronomy". Physics Today. 62 (12): 32–37. Bibcode:2009PhT....62l..32L. doi:10.1063/1.3273014.
  5. ^ "Outdoor Lighting Codes". Flagstaff Dark Skies Coalition. Retrieved 17 April 2016.
  6. ^ Kyba, C. C. M.; Ruhtz, T.; Fischer, J. & Hölker, F. (2011). Añel, Juan (ed.). "Cloud Coverage Acts as an Amplifier for Ecological Light Pollution in Urban Ecosystems". PLOS ONE. 6 (3): e17307. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...617307K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017307. PMC 3047560. PMID 21399694.
  7. ^ a b c d Luginbuhl, C.; Boley, P.; Davis, D. (2014). "The impact of light source spectral power distribution on sky glow". Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 139: 21–26. Bibcode:2014JQSRT.139...21L. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.12.004.
  8. ^ Garstang, R. (1989). "Night-Sky Brightness at Observatories and Sites". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 101: 306. Bibcode:1989PASP..101..306G. doi:10.1086/132436.
  9. ^ a b Duriscoe, D.; Luginbuhl, C.; Moore, C. (2007). "Measuring Night-Sky Brightness with a Wide-Field CCD Camera". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 119 (852): 192–213. arXiv:astro-ph/0702721. Bibcode:2007PASP..119..192D. doi:10.1086/512069. S2CID 53331822.
  10. ^ Ashley, A.; Duriscoe, D.; Luginbuhl, C. (2017). "Measuring the color and brightness of artificial sky glow from cities using an all-sky imaging system calibrated with astronomical methods in the Johnson-Cousins B and V photometric systems". American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting. 229: 236.20. Bibcode:2017AAS...22923620P.
  11. ^ Bortle, John E. (February 2001). "Observer's Log – Introducing the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on 2006-03-16.
  12. ^ Sánchez de Miguel, Alejandro; Aubé, Martin; Zamorano, Jaime; Kocifaj, Miroslav; Roby, Johanne; Tapia, Carlos (3 March 2017). "Sky Quality Meter measurements in a colour-changing world". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 467 (3): 2966. arXiv:1701.05019. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.467.2966S. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx145. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  13. ^ a b Walker, M. F. (1977). "The Effects of Urban Lighting on the Brightness of the Night Sky". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 89: 405. Bibcode:1977PASP...89..405W. doi:10.1086/130142.
  14. ^ a b Aubé, M. [in French]; Roby, J.; Kocifaj, M. (2013). "Evaluating Potential Spectral Impacts of Various Artificial Lights on Melatonin Suppression, Photosynthesis, and Star Visibility". PLOS ONE. 8 (7): e67798. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...867798A. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067798. PMC 3702543. PMID 23861808.
  15. ^ Smith, D. "Shift to High-Tech Streetlights Saves Dark Skies, Money". Big Island Now. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  16. ^ a b Flagstaff Dark Skies Coalition. "Lamp Spectrum and Light Pollution". Lamp Spectrum and Light Pollution. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  17. ^ Bierman, A. (2012). "Will switching to LED outdoor lighting increase sky glow?". Lighting Research and Technology. 44 (4): 449–458. doi:10.1177/1477153512437147. S2CID 110024170.
  18. ^ Ashdown, I. (20 October 2015). "Light pollution depends on the light source CCT". LEDs Magazine. PennWell Corporation. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  19. ^ International Dark-Sky Association. "Visibility, Environmental, and Astronomical Issues Associated with Blue – Rich White Outdoor Lighting" (PDF). International Dark-Sky Association. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  20. ^ "Fitted Target Efficacy metric promotes discussion". LEDs Magazine. 12 October 2009. Retrieved 18 April 2016.
  21. ^ Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP)
  22. ^ Rich, C.; Longcore, T., eds. (2006). Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Washington; Covelo; London: Island Press.
  23. ^ C.B. Luginbuhl (2001). R. J. Cohen; W. T. Sullivan III (eds.). "Why Astronomy Needs Low-Pressure Sodium Lighting". Preserving the Astronomical Sky, IAU Symposium No. 196. 196: 81–86. Bibcode:2001IAUS..196...81L.
  24. ^ Warrant, Eric; Dacke, Marie (1 January 2010). "Visual Orientation and Navigation in Nocturnal Arthropods". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 75 (3): 156–173. doi:10.1159/000314277. PMID 20733292. S2CID 22906227.
  25. ^ Kyba, C. C. M.; Ruhtz, T.; Fischer, J.; Hölker, F. (17 December 2011). "Lunar skylight polarization signal polluted by urban lighting". Journal of Geophysical Research. 116 (D24): D24106. Bibcode:2011JGRD..11624106K. doi:10.1029/2011JD016698. S2CID 56378009.
  26. ^ Smyth, T. J.; Wright, A. E.; Edwards-Jones, A.; McKee, D.; Queirós, A.; Rendon, O.; Tidau, S.; Davies, T. W. (2022). "Disruption of marine habitats by artificial light at night from global coastal megacities". Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 10 (1): 00042. Bibcode:2022EleSA..10...42S. doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00042. hdl:10037/28198. ISSN 2325-1026. S2CID 254213236.
  27. ^ Falchi, F.; et al. (10 June 2016). "The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness". Science Advances. 2 (6): e1600377. arXiv:1609.01041. Bibcode:2016SciA....2E0377F. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600377. PMC 4928945. PMID 27386582.
  28. ^ Saleh, Tiffany. "Effect of Artificial Lighting on Wildlife". Road RIPorter. Wildlands CPR. Archived from the original on September 10, 2012. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
  29. ^ Smyth, T. J.; Wright, A. E.; McKee, D.; Tidau, S.; Tamir, R.; Dubinsky, Z.; Iluz, D.; Davies, T. W. (2021-12-13). "A global atlas of artificial light at night under the sea". Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 9 (1): 00049. Bibcode:2021EleSA...9...49S. doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00049. hdl:10037/24006. ISSN 2325-1026. S2CID 245169968.
  30. ^ Rodríguez, Airam; Orozco-Valor, Paula Maiten; Sarasola, José Hernán (January 2021). "Artificial light at night as a driver of urban colonization by an avian predator". Landscape Ecology. 36 (1): 17–27. Bibcode:2021LaEco..36...17R. doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01132-3. hdl:10261/221083.
  31. ^ McMahon, Oak; Smyth, Tim; Davies, Thomas W. (2022-03-25). "Broad spectrum artificial light at night increases the conspicuousness of camouflaged prey". Journal of Applied Ecology. 59 (5): 1365–2664.14146. Bibcode:2022JApEc..59.1324M. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14146. hdl:10026.1/18654. ISSN 0021-8901. S2CID 247754178.
  32. ^ Davies, Thomas W.; Levy, Oren; Tidau, Svenja; de Barros Marangoni, Laura Fernandes; Wiedenmann, Joerg; D’Angelo, Cecilia; Smyth, Tim (2023-05-15). "Global disruption of coral broadcast spawning associated with artificial light at night". Nature Communications. 14 (1): 2511. Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.2511D. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38070-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 10185496. PMID 37188683.
  33. ^ Rodríguez, Airam; Holmes, Nick D.; Ryan, Peter G.; Wilson, Kerry-Jayne; Faulquier, Lucie; Murillo, Yovana; Raine, André F.; Penniman, Jay F.; Neves, Verónica; Rodríguez, Beneharo; Negro, Juan J.; Chiaradia, André; Dann, Peter; Anderson, Tracy; Metzger, Benjamin; Shirai, Masaki; Deppe, Lorna; Wheeler, Jennifer; Hodum, Peter; Gouveia, Catia; Carmo, Vanda; Carreira, Gilberto P.; Delgado-Alburqueque, Luis; Guerra-Correa, Carlos; Couzi, François-Xavier; Travers, Marc; Corre, Matthieu Le (October 2017). "Seabird mortality induced by land-based artificial lights: Seabird Mortality and Artificial Lights". Conservation Biology. 31 (5): 986–1001. doi:10.1111/cobi.12900. hdl:10400.3/4515. PMID 28151557.
  34. ^ Marangoni, Laura F. B.; Davies, Thomas; Smyth, Tim; Rodríguez, Airam; Hamann, Mark; Duarte, Cristian; Pendoley, Kellie; Berge, Jørgen; Maggi, Elena; Levy, Oren (September 2022). "Impacts of artificial light at night in marine ecosystems—A review". Global Change Biology. 28 (18): 5346–5367. doi:10.1111/gcb.16264. hdl:11568/1165839. PMID 35583661.
  35. ^ Longcore, T.; Rich, C. "Ecological Light Pollution" (PDF). Frontiers in Ecology. The Ecological Society of America. Retrieved March 3, 2012.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skyglow&oldid=1248033170"