Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ella Peterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 05:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. Vanity. Smoddy (tgec) 17:00, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete seems to be vanity by a kid... delete but nicely. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:46, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nicely. Gotta agree with starblind.. It's too cute not to be deleted nicely. Preisler 23:56, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Bend over a rail and delete roughly from behind, because I hate cuteness and this is a textbook example of What Wikipedia Is Not. (But don't treat the vanity author kid that way.) Barno 16:07, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, the humanity! Delete with a gentle touch, tempered by mercy, kindness, teddy bears, smiley emoticons, and little hearts. And a big warm fuzzy hug for Barno. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 16:23, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity, not notable. OK, I'm writing this in my green ink, but what Unicode character can I use to put little circles instead of dots over the i's? Dpbsmith (talk) 17:36, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I fail to see how this is different from any of the other countless vanity pages. Delete in a very normal fashion. — JIP | Talk 19:06, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it's different because she seems to be only ten years old or so, and thus can't really be expected to know better. That said, delete. DS 14:59, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Pavel Vozenilek 18:05, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.