Talk:Netzer Olami

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Merge, 28 February 2024, see discussion.
speedy keep, 20 May, 2006, see discussion.

[Untitled]

Hey all who may read this, I started this article. But I'm having trouble writing it from a NPOV. Please help? There's information on the external link. Thanks in advance. --Hersch 03:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Netzer Platform

User:131.111.200.200 (contribs has inserted the Netzer Platform ("a simplified version") into the article. This is precisely the sort of material that was removed from the Habonim Dror article. Although I wikified it a little, the Platform here needs to be reduced to a few basic points. This is an encyclopedia, not a document repository and you won't find the entire text of the Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth in the article called Australia, but you may find something about its ethos and how it works. --jnothman ^talk 15:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RSY netzer

Why does RSY netzer keep being removed from the names of United Kingdom Netzer movement. In the UK there are two seperate movements affiliated to netzer both LJY and the bigger RSY. Both need to be included

I don't know. I didn't understand why this line was the focus of so much editing... Now your comment here explains that. It was last changed by an anonymous user in this edit. If you look at that user's contribs, you'll find it's a pet issue of theirs and may want to take it up on their talk page. jnothman ^talk 03:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs history and more information

We need less ideology and nonsense like semel explanation, and much more on the organisation's background and membership in an encyclopedic sense. jnothman ^talk 10:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shnat Netzer Copyright

I've removed the section on Shnat Netzer, because it was taken directly from Netzer's website, which is under copyright. Orthogonal1 (talk) 06:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've also had to remove the sections on history, and most of the section on the semel, again because of copyright. Orthogonal1 (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And, most of the leading paragraph had to be deleted (replacing pronouns does not change the copyright status of the work) Orthogonal1 (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]