Talk:Léon Wurmser

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

VFD candidate? →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 07:34, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)

PROD removal

I've removed the proposed deletion tag on this article; a few months back, I did some cleanup and expansion on this after thinking myself that it might be proddable. It would appear from the Google Scholar results I linked to at the bottom of the page that the subject is, in fact, notable and should pass WP:PROF for his body of work and the awards received. Apologies if it reads like vanity; I'm certainly not the subject, I know that much - I stumbled over this article through the random article link and decided it needed fixing. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, he published some papers but doesn't seem to fir the WP:PROF that I can tell --AW 23:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think my consideration is that his book "The Mask of Shame" is cited by quite a few other authors and has been reprinted numerous times over the years. Here's a Google Scholar link of the cites to that book. He's also got several other books that aren't quite as established, and is apparently still writing these days. I think that fits criteria 3 and 4. Tony Fox (arf!) 00:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the count of papers from PubMed (a free database), and the citation counts for papers and books from Web of Science, a more complete source than Google Scholar for anything pre-1998, if one has access. The number of books is more than sufficient for N, especially considering the number of citations. The number of papers is also more than enough even considered separately from the books. Unfortunately his career was before the era of google, but that does not make him less notable. The translations prove international repute, the many eds. prove wide-spread use. DGG 01:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just weighing in 15 months later. I read an article by Wurmser in a compendium of the Annals of the New York Academy of Science titled 'Opiates in Mental Illness,' published 1980. It piqueued my interest enough to look it up and I was pleased but surprised to find an article. I do admit it's a little too much like a resume, but such is the nature of an article on this subject just like a stub on a chemical is going to read like a chart. I'm glad it was kept and if I can find some relevant places to link to it, I will do so. However, someone like Wurmser I think is more likely that the article is searched for than stumbled upon through wikibrowsing, so its orphan status is not as important as the article itself. Mr0t1633 (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Léon Wurmser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002115455/http://www.apsa.org/Portals/1/docs/JAPA/523/Wurmser-911-926.pdf to http://www.apsa.org/Portals/1/docs/JAPA/523/Wurmser-911-926.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]