Talk:Hertzsprung–Russell diagram

Astronomy Top‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

A peculiar characteristic of this form of the H–R diagram is that the temperatures are plotted "from high temperature to low temperature, which aids in comparing this form of the H–R diagram with the observational form."

since this is on a log scale, it might be called a plot of the reciprocal absolute temperature, which as we all know makes more sense anyway 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:CD8E:A2F0:3F79:2CCF (talk) 12:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a suggestion for a small change

While looking at the "Historical background" section (Hertzsprung–Russell diagram#Historical background) of the "Latest revision as of 02:00, 17 December 2023" version of this article, I noticed a word that may have some "room for improvement".

It was the word "equivalent" in the sentence

The apparent magnitude of stars in the same cluster is equivalent to their absolute magnitude and so this early diagram was effectively a plot of luminosity against temperature.

My suggestion is to change that one word -- ("equivalent") -- to [something more like] "proportional" or "analogous" ... or maybe even "indicative of".

Any comments? Mike Schwartz (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]