Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:VIP)
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 14:39 on 5 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    [edit]

    User-reported

    [edit]
    Left them a link to WP:RGW. PhilKnight (talk) 13:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hadn't been warned. Warned level 3. Also left a note about lack of edit summaries. PhilKnight (talk) 13:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Have been warned level 2. Inclined to wait until they are warned some more, and still add unsourced information. PhilKnight (talk) 14:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We did reach a compromise for the most part, to clarify that 777-200LRF is used by cargo airlines. 24.206.65.150 (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Its actually minor wording differences between the two versions, so "vandalism" was misused to try to strengthen ZLEA's arguement. [5] Plus it is sourced [6] 24.206.65.150 (talk) 14:11, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PhilKnight Please see User talk:24.206.65.142. This editor has been attempting to pass off unofficial designations as official across at least three IPs. A range block might be necessary to prevent further disruption. - ZLEA T\C 14:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]