Talk:Crash (2004 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crash (2004 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 14 days

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Canadian / German / Persian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Persian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Untitled

Iranian shop is burgarlized. Another story missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.240.50.133 (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Tried to pare it down a bit - a lot of details, while important to the film itself, probably aren't necessary to an encyclopedia summary. There's probably more that can be cut too. I'm wondering if the film doesn't lend itself to a linear narrative summary - something along the lines of "Crash tells several intertwining stories set in LA, including those of blah-de-blah who do such and such". If I hadn't watched the film very recently I'm not sure how clear some of the synopsis would be to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.104.24 (talk) 00:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this scene should be mentioned in the plot, it's definitely one of the most important scenes in the movie.--Reprarina (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final song missing..

After Maybe Tomorrow plays the credites there is a final song, a "rap". The chorus of this is (not 100% certain of the last two lines):-

These problems they're yours and mine 
'cos we all pay for the crime 
it's time we learned to react 
no hiding no turning back
no more excuses or lies
as only truth will survive
that's how we borrow the tune
I'll learn tomorrow with you.

Anyone know what this is and who wrote/performed it? I can find zip about it online.

LookingGlass (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015141033/http://www.starz.com/originals/crash/ to http://www.starz.com/originals/crash

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425142459/http://filmcriticism.allegheny.edu/archives31_2.htm to http://filmcriticism.allegheny.edu/archives31_2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Criticism Section

Very regrettable that the way the criticism section is structured now, it reads like this movie was initially lauded and is now retrospectively considered as trash. First of all, we are not talking about a historical piece of art that is now re-evaluated through the lens of past centuries. And secondly, the "retrospective" paragraphs seem highly selective and biased, in all frankness. Pajeon (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]