Jump to content

Talk:Some Girls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two Covers

[edit]

Why are there two versions of the same cover all of a sudden? Some Girls has two covers and both should be represented. Stan weller 00:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Can we get the censored cover, please? AmericanLeMans (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are three different versions, actually. The third and final version of the album art did away with the die-cuts and replaced the Stones' drag-queen likenesses with hand-drawn women, drawn to look as real as possible. It was this version of the album art that had been used on the CBS-era issues on LP, cassette and CD, but I wonder if it had been used by Atlantic Records since about 1979-1980??? WikiPro1981X (talk) 17:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SomeGirls78.jpg

[edit]

Image:SomeGirls78.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Some girls.jpg

[edit]

Image:Some girls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs clean up

[edit]

Choice of verbs is especially a problem. For example, saying Mick claims to be influenced by disco makes me laugh every time I read it. Obviously, there's disco on the album. Is the article challenging whether Mick knows what disco is? Whether he was really influenced by it? Whether it was someone else (not Mick) who was really influenced? This kind of thing goes on throughout articles on the Stones. Mick has said he was influenced by disco (in more than one printed source). So, why not just use simple, factual language. Mick says...

Passive voice in first paragraph could be made active, especially as the album sold quite well (IIRC), and still sells. So it was a highlight. Maybe it's the word "output" or something. At any rate, needs to be strengthened. If no objections, I'll put this on my to do list.--69.108.136.43 (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think having links to words like dinosaurs (when the phrase is cultural dinosaurs)is silly and distracting.LeValley 20:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Additionally, the sentence, "His approach to recording breathed life into the somewhat dense sounding recordings like Goats Head Soup (1973) and It's Only Rock 'n Roll (1974) albums." makes no sense. It makes it sounds as though Chris Kimsey engineered those album, when as far as I can tell, he was not involved with them at all. I suppose that the writer of this sentence was trying to contrast 'Some Girls' with those other two albums, but completely failed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.187.2 (talk) 03:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Punks, in 1977, didn't "idolize" the Rolling Stones

[edit]

Or anyone! Idolizing bands was antithetical to what punk rock was about. Mick Jagger was seen as a show-biz celebrity, at least by the Sex Pistols and their friends (source: PUNK magazine). What did the Clash sing: "No Elvis, Beatles or Rolling Stones in 1977". Adding citation needed tags for now.Smitse (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss You controversy

[edit]

I took the following section out as it appears controversial and largely WP:OR. When it has references it can maybe be included again. Karst (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

″There was some controversy surrounded the lyrics to the title song, an extended musing on women of various nationalities and races. The line "Black girls just wanna get fucked all night" drew strong protests from various groups, including Jesse Jackson's PUSH. Jagger famously replied, "I've always said, you can't take a joke, it's too fucking bad," although he was reportedly more conciliatory to Jackson in private, as he claimed the song was intended as a parody of racist attitudes. Saturday Night Live cast member Garrett Morris would have the final say on the controversy with a mock-editorial on the show's Weekend Update segment: After giving the impression that he was going to openly criticise the Stones, he quoted a sanitised version of the "Black girls just..." line, then stated "I have one thing to say to you, Mr. Mick Jagger ... where are these black girls ... you got any phone numbers?!?" ″

I added some references but left out the SNL bit since that seems more of pop culture reference. Piriczki (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Some_Girls&oldid=1211372202"