User talk:Tgeller
Hello! If you want to comment on the proposed deletion of Hopkin Green Frog, you should not do so on its talk page, like you did, but on this deletion page. There seems to be a majority for keep so it will probably not be deleted, but it's valuable to hear another opinion nevertheless. Gerrit CUTEDH 18:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Elizabeth Moon. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 02:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Your addition has been removed not becasue you formated the reverences wrong, but becasue it violates the WP:BLP policy in making a connection between two events that is not asserted in the sources. The addition of the "controversy" material is on discussion on the talk page, and you are wlecome to participate in the discussions, but please stop adding hte section until you have gained a WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page to do so, and have addressed the BLP concerns. Thanks. - BilCat (talk)
30 rock
[edit]Here is my gut-feeling explanation of why your paragraph about 30 rock in the Needmore article is inappropriate. Needmore is a real town with real people. The article is about 2 paragraphs long including your paragraph on 30 rock. That means half of the article is about a fictional event that you and very few others care about. Your statement that "this really happened" is ridiculous - it is a fictional show. If you must include something in wikipedia linking Needmore to 30 rock, find a place in the 30 rock article to include a link to Needmore. Or create an article on the 30 rock episode and build in a link there. Communicate with other editors that write about 30 rock and see what they think.Jstuby (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input -- I'm glad we're having this discussion. I've responded on your Talk page and am reading up on the proper way to resolve this dispute I'll provide further details on your Talk page. --tgeller (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Tgeller! I saw that you were one of the few "recently" active editors of the Smart grid in China article. I'm a paid COI editor, and have an updated draft of the article linked on the talk page, and I'm hoping you might be willing to review some of my proposed changes. I'm relatively new here, so any feedback on whether I'm maintaining NPOV and adding useful content would be immensely helpful. Thanks! --FacultiesIntact (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Acquia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article fails to establish notability under WP:NCORP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brandon (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)