Talk:Drop (liquid)

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Water Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Non-tropical / Floods / General High‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as High-importance).

250,000

Some useless trivia - the Polish version of this article is 250,000th article on the Polish Wikipedia. Яǿǿ⁷² ✉ 08:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But now significant longer than this one, that is some useless trivia, too ;-). Cheers, 83.238.66.225 06:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drop oscillation

I remember that there is a formula for the frequency of oscillation of a drop of non-viscous liquid close to sphericity, under the influence of the surface tension. But I don't remember the formula. Can someone put it on the page? At least for the first mode of vibration. Better still if there is a formula for other modes. (I have searched for such a formula on the Polish page - all I managed to grasp is that a drop is a kropla!) David Olivier 00:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drop/Droplet

If droplet redirects to drop, is it good practice to use drop in other articles?Trialex 05:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. JIMp_talk·cont 08:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

chaos

The drops from a dripping tap do not drip with a constant frequency. In fact it is a chaotic phenomenon. The animation suggests the regular viewpoint instead. Not sure how to fix the animation itself. Maybe a simple note would be good enough. --MarSch 10:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly constant, but close. Do you have a reference? — Omegatron 05:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drop size formula

I think it's almost certain that the equation linking drop size to surface tension is wrong. The factor was changed from 2 to 3 without explanation in the 09:16, 8 February 2006 edit.

I think that the factor should be changed back to 2, and the contact angle in the diagram should be measured at the place where the drop forms, not at a second meniscus in the tube. With these two modifications, the equation then represents a correct force balance between the weight of the drop and the surface tension, assuming that the flow rate is zero and that the pressure at the tube opening (just above the drop) is the same as atmospheric pressure. I can't find any references for this though: the standard way of measuring surface tension from a pendant drop seems to be the method of Harkins and Brown (Harkins, W.D, Brown, F.E, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 41, 499 (1919)) which does not involve the contact angle explicitly, but instead relies on a drop shape correction factor that is linked to it. Chrisjohnson (talk) 02:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified the diagram, updated the article and included a few of the references I used. While the final formula didn't come from any particular reference, the derivation is trivial based on the source material. LightYear (talk) 04:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Average tap water drop volume

Mention the volume of a tap water droplet. I bet it is only affected by temperature. Jidanni (talk) 13:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But add the tension gas liquid whit the cosine and the tension liquid solid whit no cosine (liquid solid perpendicular to g) is not a bit more correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.9.168.212 (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pendant drop test

According to Adamson, A.W., Physical Chemistry of Surfaces (5th ed., 1990), the pendant drop test is different (p.28-30), and the mentioned test is the drop weight method (p.21-23). effeietsanders 22:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Column?

How can a drop be described as a "column of liquid"? That implies a cylindrical shape, to me. Why wouldn't "sphere" be a better term? 212.9.31.12 (talk) 07:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2mm

"The shape of a drop falling through a gas is actually more or less spherical for drops less than 2mm in diameter."

Isn't that for water falling through air? I'd assume a different size is relevant to lead falling through hydrogen (or lead falling in a shot tower to produce balls of shot larger than 2mm). Card Zero (talk) 19:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drop (liquid). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drop (liquid). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130731002444/http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/Publications/PDFs/Gent_98.pdf to http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/Publications/PDFs/Gent_98.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.liquidartgallery.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]