Jump to content

Talk:January 1998 North American ice storm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJanuary 1998 North American ice storm was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 23, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 4, 2011.
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are issues concerning sourcing that need to be addressed. I have made minor corrections and have included a point below that need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Please address them within seven days and the article will maintain its GA status. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN.

  1. The article was passed in 2006, and since then, the GA criteria have changed concerning sourcing. The first two sections are lacking sources for the information present and there are also several "citation needed" tags found in the rest of the article. For the article to maintain its GA status, inline citations need to be added for the statements that have statistics, information that may be questioned by a reader for its verifiability, and the current "cn" tags. I would recommend using the current sources/external links to see if any of the information can be used for sourcing the other statements in the article and looking for other web/book sources for assistance.

This article covers the topic well and if the above issues are addressed, I believe the article can remain a GA. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed to complete the work, one may be given. I will leave messages on the talk pages of the main contributors to the article along with related WikiProjects so that the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is only tangentially related to the above post. I found some references that may have useful information to incorporate into this article:
If someone has the time or inclination, they should consider incorporating it into the article. Mindmatrix 15:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Failed

[edit]

Since the issues I raised were not addressed, I have regrettably delisted the article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. If the issues are fixed, consider renominating the article at WP:GAN. Good job to Mindmatrix for adding the sources above, hopefully they are integrated into the article soon. If you disagree with this review, you can seek an alternate opinion at Good article reassessment. If you have any questions let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reqphoto

[edit]

A photo of the collapsed high tension pylons in Quebec would be nice, it'd be more illustrative of the power of this ice storm that the current trees in the info box, if someone has the rows of collapsed metal towers. 70.55.85.143 (talk) 11:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request accomplished. Photo added. --CyclePat (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. Photo was deleted for copyright purposes. The request still stands. Sorry. --CyclePat (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out for more sources here

[edit]

http://blog.fagstein.com/2008/01/05/ice-storm-anniversary-coverage/ --CyclePat (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I wrote EC to ask them why this link was dead and if there's another copy: http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/media/icestorm98/icestorm98_the_worst_e.cfm - I couldn't find anything by a quick search. --TheAnarcat (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on North American Ice Storm of 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 1998 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:January 1998 North American ice storm/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Meteorology:

Substituted at 04:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on January 1998 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on January 1998 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 1998 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]