Talk:Lyme disease

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyme disease article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 60 days

Lyme disease was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 1, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
February 27, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
March 20, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 20, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 19, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Medicine: Dermatology / Translation / Neurology High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lyme disease.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Lyme disease. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Lyme disease at the Reference desk.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 28 to July 4, 2015 (16th)

Sexual transmission

Within the past 10 years they have begun to revise the idea that Lymes disease is not transmissible through unprotected sex, with couples showing the same strains regularly.

I will not edit the article but I think its worth considering. https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-sexual-transmission-2/ 2601:154:C000:4CF0:5B6:330A:A3C8:3070 (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lymedisease.org is not a credible source, and neither are the self identified ”LLMDs” commentating over the article.

The study cited was funded by Charles E. Holman Morgellons Disease Foundation which is part of a broader misinformation campaign surrounding Lyme, and the authors didn’t disclose that in their study. EVOSexybeast (talk) 04:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of (debunked ) conspiracy theories?

I think the page is very good and comprehensive. However, I looked for the term conspiracy on the page and didnt find it. I wonder if this is undue apprehension ? I think we should take misinformation head on.

A widely circulated conspiracy theory is that B.burgdorferi was manipulated at Plum Island. I think this should be mentioned, but wanted to test teh waters on talk before adding it. Wuerzele (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is more relevant to plum island than Lyme disease. It would more likely belong here if not already on there https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_Island_Animal_Disease_Center EVOSexybeast (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reference error

number 27 links to a dead government link 68.51.184.18 (talk) 01:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. --McSly (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]