User talk:Thewanderer

Welcome!

Hi, Thewanderer, Welcome to Wikipedia!

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar

More... • Learn how

Fix wikilinks

More... • Learn how

Update with new information

More... • Learn how

Expand short articles

More... • Learn how

Check and add references

More... • Learn how

Fix original research issues

More... • Learn how

Improve lead sections

More... • Learn how

Add an image

More... • Learn how

Translate and clean up

More... • Learn how

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Happy Wiki-ing. -- John Fader 18:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Croatian ancestry

Hello! I personally don't have too much experience with genealogical research. But I can probably help you a bit. The parish church in Lovrec (with contact info found here) would have fairly detailed records at least as far back as 1945, and likely farther. There is a neighbourhood or village within Lovrec that is actually named Kasumi, so most if not all people there would also be named Kasum.

I'm not sure how much you know about Croatia. Zagreb is the capital and by far the largest city. Its cemeteries have largely been digitized and can be searched online. A search for your last name provides eight results. Lovrec is located in the coastal region of Dalmatia and is culturally linked to the town of Imotski. The population has been fairly depressed over the last forty years as can be seen here. Many inhabitants have likely moved to Split (the capital of Dalmatia) or Zagreb. However, there are also likely many people from that area who have moved to North America. There is a Croatian parish in Los Angeles that could likely help you in your search. The Croatian community in Los Angeles was largely founded by people from Dalmatia, so you may find some connections there.

There isn't too much English-language material that you could find on a town of this size. Looking up some general texts on Dalmatia, specifically the Dalmatian hinterland (Dalmatinska zagora), would likely provide some useful information about the area.--Thewanderer (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Lovrec, Croatia ancestry.

WOW! What an extraordinary response. I am deeply moved, and very grateful to you. THANK YOU! Eric Kasum Scubeesnax (talk)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scubeesnax (talk • contribs) 00:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My family comes from Lovrec, Croatia and I would like to learn more about it, and possibly locate family relatives. I notice you wrote an article about a Catholic priest from Lovrec, and I thought you might have some good ideas to help me. Thank you for any helpful thoughts. My very best. Warmly, Eric Kasum, Los Angeles, USA Scubeesnax (talk)scubeesnax —Preceding undated comment added 19:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Re: Josip Juraj Strossmayer

Weird! Perhaps the database misrecorded someone else's edits, somehow. --Joy [shallot] 20:56, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re: 1991 BiH census Muslim vs. Bosniak

I put in Muslims by nationality because that was the most accurate description of the option shown in the census. However, I don't object to the changes, either, because it was only a couple of years later that the Bosnian Muslims changed their collective name to Bosniaks and since then the phrase "Muslims by nationality" is not accepted as a nationality in Bosnia and Herzegovina (as far as I know). Technically we could add a note to each of those premature mentions of "Bosniak" but it makes little practical difference. --Joy [shallot] 21:07, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was the Una-Cetina line border between Croats and Serbs in the Medieval Ages? HolyRomanEmperor 15:56, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of List of Bosnians

Hi there... you forgot to vote ;-) --Dijxtra 13:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hercegovina

The answer to your question can be clarified by simply putting it as if hercegovina is a part of Bosnia. It's a common misunderstanding to believe that hercegovina and Bosnia are two differenten countries, but however the case is not so, Bosnia counts for the whole surface of the Country while hercegovina is just a part of Bosnias surface. Oh gush I maybe complicated it, you could say by other words hercegovina is just a county within Bosnia. Damir Mišić ~(oh yes btw. please put up headlines on my disc. page and don't just write messages with out a headline)

Ime drzave Bosne I hercegovine se je malo izkompleksiralo, ali jedan licnost je ako bi se Hrvatska zvala "Hrvatska i Dalmacija"...Damir Mišić ~

No, sjeti se Hrvatska i Slavonija koja je postojala od 19 vijeka do ukidanja 1921 novim ustavom Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca. HolyRomanEmperor 17:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uffff...skoro ce HolyRomanEmperor da svede cijelu Jugoslaviju za sobom. --VKokielov 03:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Croatian_history

I think that we need this category; I have included the Category:History_of_Croatia on numerious articles (Duklja, Zahumlje, Travunia), but it would be somewhat incorrect. Why can't we have Category:Croatian_history so that we can place it everywhere and end were there is a presence of Croatian historical legacy (i. e. Boka Kotorska, Kosovo, Vojvodina). Could you make that category? --HolyRomanEmperor 19:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) Could you please put that category on those my articles to the up (I don't really have time)? And there are a lot of other articles that should have that instead of Category:History of Croatia. Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 13:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, samo imam mali problem. Duklja se nije nalazila na teritoriju trenutnih granica Hrvatske, vec samo kada se proširila na zapad, jednom prilikom i do Knina. Da li onda da taj članak sadrži Category:History of Croatia ili Category:Croatian history? --HolyRomanEmperor 22:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Herzegovinians

Because I believe the statements in the paragraph just aren't correct. The term (Bosnians) hasn't been "recently" applied to Herzegovinians because Herzegovina has been just one part of the Bosnian political unit for centuries. Thats why you'll find numerous mentions of people from Herzegovina since the late middle ages who are also referred to as Bosnians. And nothing has been "limited to the Bosniak population" - I know this from personal experience. Three fourths of my family originate from Herzegovina and I still have lots of relatives in Konjic, Mostar, Stolac, etc. There's definitely a strong sense of regional pride among them that I think is no less than that among their Serb or Croat neighbors.

Regarding the article, I don't mind there being some sort of mention of this strong regional pride I described. However, I don't agree with the previous version which made it seem as if the term "Bosnians" was being forcibly applied and was without historical basis. Live Forever 01:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Thewanderer,

I came across your discussion about Herzegovina and Herzegovinians and though a couple of points could help clarify the matter. As always, all matters Balkan and, more specifically, Bosnian and Herzegovinian, are complicated and clouded by recent events.

But, as Live Forever has pointed out, the region of Herzegovina was part of Bosnia until Stjepan Vukcic Kosaca took the title of Herzeg, after which the region he more or less controlled became known as Herzegovina. Kosaca himself, and those around him, were most prominent amongst the proponents of the Bosnian identity and "state" (he, of all Bosnian nobles, was the one known never to have wavered from his faith in the Bosnian Church, amongst other things, and never converted to Catholicism, which was one of the key points of contention between him and King Stephen Thomas), so, paradoxically, Herzegovina was more of a political formation created in defence of these views (and Kosaca's power, of course) than anything else.

So, the interesting thing (when you say that many Herzegovinians would never consider themselves Bosnians) is that such attitude is in fact more recent, than it is to call Herzegovinians Bosnians. Having said that, they have a strong regional identity (and Kosaca died a long time ago, :-)), which nobody denies anyway, but nobody applies 'Bosnian' as some forced upon, unifying identity to them, it's just one of those parallel historical and cultural references so often found in the Balkans and in Bosnia (so, when you read Petar Kocic, for instance, whom many Serbs consider to be a quintessential Serb - though of the Bosnian "variety", :-), you will find that he refers to himself and his people as Serbs and Bosniaks as an interchangeable term, eg see "Jazavac pred sudom"). This only becomes problematic when one starts to apply recent political and highly politicised (and emotional) approach to B&H, but has no "grounding" in the B&H culture and history. Hope this helps. Cheers. Fomafomich 05:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for your response. I haven't read the article you were writing, just left you a comment as an aside. We don't disagree on anything, what I am explaining here is that there are parallel (and some not so parallel) references to the inhabitants of Herzegovina as Zahumljani, Travuljani, Neretljani, Bosnians, Herzegovinians, Hrvati, Srbi, etc, etc ... and that, in saying that Herzegovinians are part of Bosnian cultural or political corpus is something of a historical and cultural process captured by spoken tradition, not a matter of intended offence to Herzegovinians (in other words, I was saying that whoever said it probably didn't mean to offend).

It is very clear to anyone observing contemporary political situation in Herzegovina that Herzegovinians object to being called Bosnians - and even Herzegovinians, for that matter. Whether Hum, or Iliricum, or Herzeg-Bosna or whatever else, came first or second or third, is not of personal interest to me, and neither is fighting over whether those who lived there 800 years ago had more or less right to the region than those living there 600 years ago or those who came 400 years ago.

So, what I was saying is that there is a historical consensus that Herzegovina (and, as a result, Herzegovinians) are called by that name since Herzeg Stjepan. Historically speaking, it is interesting to me how Herzegovina, from being the heart of the very existence of Bosnia during Herzeg Stjepan's times, became the opposite of that. And, as for Bosnians and Herzegovians, what I am saying is that using "Bosnian" as a reference to everyone living there is more a matter of persistence of oral tradition based on historical referencing (thus my comment about Herzeg Stjepan and Petar Kocic), than a matter of some insiduous and offensive political referencing. And if they should be called Zahumljani or Neretljani or whatever, rather than Herzegovinas, or Herzegovinians rather than Bosnians, so be it. And in any case, I don't have the naming rights, :-). Best, Fomafomich 15:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse

Ofcourse. You only needed to ask, without that hidden insult between the lines. ;-D

AFAIC, most Serbian historians argue that Vojvodina should not be considered a portion of Croatian history because they view the population as insignificant, notwithstanding that Srem was a part of Croatia at periods. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got some useful sources on the History of Herzegovina? I like how the article is currently going but its still poor; so we'll need to act fast not to let it end like a ready-to-delete stub. Any help that you can through's useful! Bog! :)--HolyRomanEmperor 16:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute...

OK, OK. I'm seeing but bad between-the-line word waves over here (you know what I mean). :(

The Eastern Herzegovina is actually the boring bit. What's really interesting is the soil between Mostar and Ston; which is a 1,000-year cultural heritage, and no one talks about it (although, a lot is known about it.) Regards, and I hope that your negative impression will disappear like morning darkness! Bog! --HolyRomanEmperor 15:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say...

..."hvala" for the HSS Infobox. Will locate and insert logo soon :) Greetingz from Iaşi in Romania (don't ask), nepTune 15:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Croats

Wow, you're rushing for a wikiproject, and I just created this shell: Portal:Croats. --HolyRomanEmperor 12:34, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Messenger

Do you use any messengers? I prefer this type of comunication. Luka Jačov 16:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its even better. I ll be on Serbian wiki IRC channel till now. Luka Jačov 18:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Petar Svačić.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Petar Svačić.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 01:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to do

Serb vandal Bormalagurski has asked his pro-Serb admin friends to help him, spamming talk pages with trolling and personal attacks, protecting the page and contrary to all rules blocking users who revert such Serb vandalism and personal attacks on their own talk page. He posted a "warning" threatening me with being "blocked for disruption" because I voted against his admin candidacy, and he and others have engaged in revert war to keep the Malagurski trolling on the user talk page. For example he also wrote on the talk page "Allow me to make an impersonation of you: Serbs are guilty for everything. All Croats are saints. I love my pope, who let's me get away with everything. I'm so Serbophobic that I can't even allow Serbian posts on my user page. That's why I voted for the deletion of the article "Serbophobia", because it doesn't exist." [1]. They are also conspiring to enforce their POV. See "User:Croatian Historian" and "Revert war" at User_talk:Bormalagurski, as well as User_talk:Purrger (one of their sockpuppet accounts) for some evidence (lots more may be found). They use large numbers of sock puppets. I don't know what to do. Admin candidacy of Bormalagurski failed for obvious reasons, but it seems some people like him were able to get enough votes. This is a very serious problem for those who oppose the massive Serb nationalist vandalism on dozens of articles and Greater Serbian anti-Croatian propaganda articles.

Template

This user participates in
WikiProject Croatia.

Hey, I made a template for everyone who's a part of this project! Put it on your user page, maybe more people will join when they see how cool it would look on their page!!! --M.B. 01:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:WikiMB

Just a short note to let you know that User:WikiMB is, in all likelyhood, another account that has been opened by User:Bormalagurski. Given the number of his edits and the approach he is using he is probably aiming at eventually getting adminship at Wikipedia which User:Bormalagurski failed to secure on a couple of attempts for all the known reasons. Needless to say, this would have interesting consequences on our efforts to maintain articles related to Croatia. I had suspected this for some time, but I didn't have any proof until yesterday (April 2) when User:Bormalagurski made a mistake of deleting a Luka Jačov's comment left on User:WikiMB's discussion under Re:Template. Luka Jačov appeared 5 minutes after this deletion and left a slightly modified comment. Pretty interesting tempering with another user's page on the part of User:Bormalagurski. Of course, User:WikiMB re-appeared 5 minutes later as if nothing had happened to add another PR remark. For more info check WB's history page]. EurowikiJ 12:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a follow-up on the note that I have left above. The administrator on the check-user page has decided not to conduct a check on the User:Bormalagurski and User:WikiMB. Though my claim was based on a chain of strange edits that took place on WikiMB's discussion page on April 2 and certainly not on any editing pattern, the administrator concluded that "Just from looking at the contributions I find it unlikely that these two are sockpuppets of one another; they appear to me to be distinct editors.". Hence, the request was denied and the accounts in question were not checked. For User:Bormalagurski and User:WikiMB's reaction(s) and arguments, please see the entry at Request for Check User page, WikiMB's and my talk pages. EurowikiJ 09:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

You're the only one to whom I'm writing this. I've lost trust in the only person I've trusted, and I have no where else to turn. I've joined Wikipedia at the advice of my friend Boris Malagurski with a goal of helping out with Croatia-related articles, but now I've been accused of being a sockpupped of Boris, by EurowikiJ. I'm not asking for anything from you... I just had to say this to someone... I feel really bad right now... So far, Wikipedia has been a really fun experience for me, now... Well, thanks for reading this. Sorry to bother you. --M.B. 23:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't imagine how much I appreciate you taking the time to give me words of helpful advice. The request for CheckUser was denied, and now I have to work on clearing my name to others... I must admit it will be hard for me to forgive EurowikiJ for what he has done to me, but in time, I hope we could cooperate in making Wikipedia a better place for everyone. Once again, thank you for taking the time to give me advice. --M.B. 00:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:POV tag at Boka Kotorska

Ofcourse. Any of those you mentioned are more than sencible. In fact, I placed the wrong tag. It's not POV, it's just silly. Just think of it, a geographical site (a bay) and having a section named by a foreign country.

Deside what you think's best. All the best! --HolyRomanEmperor 20:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP Croatia

Hi, I saw the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Croatia/Policy, but I find it too general; all of it is already summarized in various WP:Pages. You might as well wrote "behave nice" :-). By the way, I didn't see too much Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian edit warring recently; the things seem to relatively quiet up (maybe because Nikola Smolenski and Emir Arven are inactive :-)? ). The most active Serbian and Croatian editors in the last days are mostly reasonable (if PoV-able on occasion). (Disclaimer: I don't watch many, if any, pages related with Yugoslav wars.) That isn't to say that the articles are good overall, just that extreme PoV pushing from the past is being replaced with moderate PoV-pushing. (Btw, we're having problems with several Kosovar editors recently; the Kosovo-related articles – which I don't care much about – are Serbian-PoV-ed, but they apply tactic "shoot first" instead of discussing).

But I'm digressing – as for general Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian consensus, we'd better have an agreement on guidelines regarding specific issues. For example, there was much debate on ethnic affiliation (and, even more, wording) for Nikola Tesla, Ivo Andrić, Meša Selimović, Ruđer Bošković etc. A guideline could be e.g:

Avoid specifying ethnic affiliation of the person in the introductory section. If it's inavoidable, use the broadest possible ("Serbian/Croatian", "Yugoslavian") or a geographic one ("from Dubrovnik"). If necessary, discuss the ethnic background or claims thereof in a separate section.

Also:

Accept that some members of your nation have performed war crimes and other bad things. Accept that it should be mentioned (and particularly, who concretely is responsible for that) in relevant articles in a NPOV manner. Don't use WP:POINT to write that e.g. "Xs are war criminals" in all X-related articles.

Etc.

Do you have a specific example of recent edit warring? Duja 18:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The confunsion over me...

that you have is enigmous to me... I categorize myself under Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro, because I live in Serbia and Montenegro. My two houses (one of them being my birthland) are in Slovenia and Croatia; while I was born in actual Croatia, my family originates from Montenegro from my mother's side. And yes, if you must really now, I converted to Orthodoxy from Catholicism officially long ago out of mere solidarization with my college-freinds. I said "Well, what the heck! It's all Christianity."

I have no idea why you barge me like that, but didn't you ever think that your he is obviously a Serb I find insultive. Trully and faithully yours, --HolyRomanEmperor 19:02, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'm very hard to offend. :) No hard feelings at all! It's just I would like that people would really state what's wrong at times, and not just blantly state that it's wrong. If you hadn't noticed I have talked to everyone over everything, and every time the agreement was orchestrated by me. But sometimes, like in the case of Euro, I talked to him twice, and he ignored both my comments. You see, the only way to interpret that is by you-know-what-way.

Sincerely yours.

P. S. When are you going back to edit the History of Herzegovina? You're needed there! --HolyRomanEmperor 18:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: jhnp

I can give it a shot, but I can't make any guarantees that I won't butcher it as well :) The translation won't rhyme, that's for sure... --Joy [shallot] 12:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hercegovci

Kako se Hercegovci osjecaju kad je njihovo ime podrijedjeno Bosancima? --HolyRomanEmperor 18:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I totally agree with you, and that is what I want you (or someone else) to write in the article; the true connection and the historical geographical meaning of herzeg-bosnia. Damir Mišić

KK Split

Zahvalio bi ti šta si napravio clanak. Bilo je stvarno sramota šta ga nije bilo i imao sam u planu to napravit. Jakiša Tomić 22:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, the Bosnian region Herzeg-bosna existed a long time before the people there even began to call themselves croats. Herzeg-bosna is a geographical region of Bosnia, thought about mentioning this in the article? Damir Mišić 01:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments on Borovo Selo raid

Please add your statement on views at the top of the talk page in the designated area. Asterion ^{talk to me} 05:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pitanje za Hercegovca

Kak' se Hercegovci osjecaju kad je njihovo ime podrijedjeno Bosancima? :) --HolyRomanEmperor 20:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mostar Municipality.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mostar Municipality.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

???

O čemu ti pričaš? Samo pokušavam da sredim kategorije Federacije, jer je neshvatljivo da još niko to nije uradio. O kakvom ratu izmena i diskusiji pričaš? PANONIAN (talk) 02:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I left the message to Panonian for similar reasons that you have discovered and I find it equally troubleing. He also added numerous RS history categories to articles that have absolutely no relation to the subject. --Dado 02:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Sibenik

You have reverted my changes. If you will do it again, I will contact a moderator to inform of your vandalism. --Giovanni Giove 19:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mostar

I don't believe Mostar minucipality has ever been divided in 2 municipalities, except that part of minicipality in Rep. Srpska being new municipality.

Can you give me some sources for your claim? --Ante Perkovic 15:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ilok

Pogledaj ovo: Talk:Ilok. Ako znaš nešto više o tome da li su porodice Gorjanski i Iločki bili Hrvati ili Mađari, molim te da napišeš tamo. PANONIAN (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BosnaCOA.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:BosnaCOA.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Chess Federation

Thanks for creating the Croatian Chess Federation article. I think it would be great if Wikipedia would have articles on all national chess federations, and your contribution helps. 165.189.91.148 15:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Zadarfest, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! MECU≈talk 17:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I have reverted the page from before my blanking. Have a good day. --MECU≈talk 04:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor

"perhaps you should've waited more than a few hours for a reply at the height of vacation season among ex-Yu users, rather than acting so rashly"

Jel? A što ti ne odgovoriš prvo tamo umesto da revertuješ? a? PANONIAN (talk) 20:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Croatian Basketball Federation.jpg replaced by better quality image and listed for deletion

An image that you uploaded, Croatian Basketball Federation.jpg, has been replaced by better quality image, Croatian Basketball Federation.png, and has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please consider checking there if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Bojan {chat} 12:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CWofI

My apologies. Was unaware about the etiquette and I noticed a Serb wikipedian doing the same (see here [[2]]) and assumed it was commonplace. I have since removed my comments from the relevant talk pages.

Thanks for the advise :) croatian_quoll 23:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dalmatia_Croatia_and_Slavonia.gif

This image you uploaded is very good. But the site you got it from has a new version of it that looks much better. Have a look. So if you want, maybe you should upload the new one; just a suggestion:) - Ivan Kricancic 14:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think I made a mistake and it's a flag from a different era. Sorry. - Ivan Kricancic 14:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maccabi

Hello Wanderer, Rosso has an Israeli citizenship and is considered an Israeli now (for example, there is a limit of 5 strangers in each team in Israel, and Rosso is not included in that count). ⌠Yellow up⌡ 19:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am sorry for the actions of my "dear" friend "Thunderman". He does not represent the BiH community. There are nationalistic people from all sides and hope you are not a person like that. Having said the latter, I would like to formally invite you back to the project, reconsidering your decisions. He cannot affect anyone else's work. I ask of this, since I would like to have different ethnicities in my project to form a better quality of articles. I never expected it to go this far, that we are having disputes. Thank you for your cooperation. Please leave me a personal message. Vseferović 22:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great then, thanks, Vseferović 22:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BiH

You might be interested in some of the recent edits to the BiH article. [3] --estavisti 21:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matej

Talk:Matej Zmajević --PaxEquilibrium 20:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might want to know...

User:Thunderman has been blocked. (This is regarding the issues of the BiH Wikiproject). He was a sockpuppet of User:Hahahahibo. Thanks for returning. Vseferović 01:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh...

Are you really a Croatian farmer? Not many farmers (ping: no generalization insult intended!) speak wise words... ;)

P. S. Well, the Serbs too don't really have their own nation-state. Some changes are being brought right now in Serbia, but they aren't really drastic, but something in-betweens (as I hear they defined Serbia a mixture between Civic-state and Nation-state, but still leaning more to the first). Bog! --PaxEquilibrium 17:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hitler Nedic meeting.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hitler Nedic meeting.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mostar / Aga Khan Award winners and Aga Khan Trust for Culture Projects cats

Hi Thewanderer. I noticed that you removed Category:Aga Khan Trust for Culture Projects and Category:Aga Khan Award for Architecture winners from the Mostar article. I believe these should be restored. I have stated my reasons on the Talk:Mostar page. -- Aylahs ^(talk) 18:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jevrem Brkovic

He didn't freely left. He was a political dissident who was practically exiled and left to Croatia under pressure. Same as Cuban emigrants to USA (almost). --PaxEquilibrium 13:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

King Petar Krešimir IV

Petar Krešimir IV of Croatia

It's a shame that we have a bad article for the very greatest ruler of Croatia. I made some expansions and tidied it, but most of the content wasn't chronological at all, and I couldn't verify anywhere. Could you please find me a source for Peter Cresimir so that I can put it (it has none whatsoever so far). Also, any assistance in cleaning up the mess and chronologically reordering it will be very much appreciated... --PaxEquilibrium 16:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no idea - but you gave the idea that I need a stop too. :) Maybe we've finally stopped being Balkanized :D "Second"? Duja has already become an admin. :) If that's what you're interested in, I could nominate you... but you gotta hurry up 'cause that will be the last thing I'll do in a time... --PaxEquilibrium 18:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Croats from Slovenia

Very good article, and useful link to the Slovenian census from where I personally updated the Yugoslavs page (ie. the 517 in Slovenia). I'd like to extend the article briefly and since you have so far been the only editor, could you tell me one small thing. The Slovenian Croats: are they diasporans originating from a region where people have traditionally called themselves Croats and have maintained their identity? Or are they ethnic locals who have simply chosen that Croatian should be their identity as should that of all Slovenes (along the lines of Starcević's 19th century sketch of Croatia including modern-day Slovenia and parts of Austria & Hungar etc)? or with such a significant number, do you know if they are a combination of the two? If not, don't worry, I'll serach more deeply. Thanks. Evlekis 16:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you may find there is a bit more to the Croatness of today's Slovenes than just old writings (after all, all nationalist theories have been based on old writings). I've read from people here the mention of Alpine Croats but what has caused me to speculate further is the inclusion of Istria in present day Croatia. According to sources, the term Croat doesn't sit as well with all Slavic locals there as it does in Zagreb, and the older encyclopaedias (Catholic, Brittanica) which just about get published before WWI, speak of ethnic Slovenes being the people of Istria, which in turn adjoins the provinces which make up todays Slovenia (and the north coast of Istria makes up Slovenia's sea access). But what is "Slovene" in meaning if not a surviving name for 'Slav'!! They all saw themselves as Slavs and my own ancestors in Macedonia long called themselves "Sloveni" before interference from Bulgarians and Serbs which as you probably know was finally settled by the idea of a "Macedonian nation entire of itself". Obviously, I am neutral and I don't argue with people's desire to be one nation more than another and like you, I am concerned for the national rights of Slovenia's Croats in every sense whatever the reason they are Croat. But back to the main points: with so many thousand there, naturally some will be from the two Yugoslavias (which explains the Serbs, Bosniaks, Montenegrins and Macedonians too) as it was better developed. But on the whole, we'll say that the main purpose of the Croats being in Slovenia is along the same lines as why we find Croats in Burgenland and accross in Bratislava, Hungary: fleeing earlier onslaughts, setting up home, maintaining/adopting identity. I take it that will be all right with you if I mention this? Evlekis 16:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hrvoje COA.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hrvoje COA.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Capljinashield.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Capljinashield.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Citluk.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Citluk.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reverts

Hi Thewanderer, I just wanted to inform you that the reverts removing Croatian names from a series of articles are not due to the edits having been made by a sock, and not because I oppose their insertion. I also greatly appreciate the spirit of compromise and the civility you have displayed in this sort of disputes, especially when dealing problematic editors such as GiorgioOrsini. Ciao,--Aldux 17:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bocans

The article's now a bigger mess than it was. Please help. Cheers and happy new year (a bit late, though)! --PaxEquilibrium 11:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

???--PaxEquilibrium 16:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hey, before any of us do anything further regarding Stjepan Tomas, I should let you know that the original move was made by User:The Wilky Bar Kid, a long-time contributor in the area of sports. Please contact him about any disputes regarding the diacritic mark, because I was following his lead.

See here. Sorry for any confusion Gracenotes ^T § 18:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, never mind, I was confusing User:The Wilky Bar Kid with someone else. He is not a long-time contributor in the area of sports... but still, he may (or may not) have a point. Gracenotes ^T § 18:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've saw your note on the talk pages... hm, that's odd. Oh well; if there's anything else that I can do to correct my mistakes, tell me. (But Stjepan Tomas and Stjepan Tomaš could be easily confused, so a disambiguation page may still be warranted.) Gracenotes ^T § 18:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I am adding back a link between Stjepan Tomas and Stjepan Tomaš Kotromanić, in case confusion results. After all, the difference is only a caron. Thanks for your help.

		The Original Barnstar
		This Barnstar is for calmly helping me with the caron problem, and for founding and following through with WikiProject Croatia. Please, keep it up! Gracenotes ^T § 18:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bok

Bokelji su mesani narod. Ovde na Wiki pise da su Bokelji po tradiciji Srbi. To je cisti Serb Pov edit. Nije istina da su Bokelji samo Srbi. Moji roditelji su Bokelji preko 500 godina i Katolici pa i donekle i Hrvati po krvi. U mestima Perast i Tivat..Bokelji su i Hrvati.

Jagoda 1 02:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article needs a lot of work - but no where does it imply that all inhabitants of Boka are Serbs.

Wanderer, I've got an idea - why don't you concentrate on Croats of Boka kotorska and I simply take a bunch of the info from the Bokelji article and merge it with the Boka kotorska article, leaving only either a redirect to that article, or at least small disambiguation page. What do you say? --PaxEquilibrium 22:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yugoslav wars

I've begun work on Template:Yugoslav wars. It's a work in progress, but feel free to add anything I've overlooked/haven't got round to yet.--Hadžija 18:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)--[reply]

Red Croatia?

This vote was brought up for the wrong reasons, relating mostly to the nominator's editting history.

Don't you think you've got it all wrong? :)

My suggestion was that the note itself isn't notable enough to be excluded from Travunia, Zachlumia and Doclea. We have Serb-POVised articles and we (had before I proofread it) a Croatian heavily POVised article. I started the vote to see if people think that Red Croatia is notable enough to be separate from those three articles. But while it is as such, for Wikipedia's policies of no repetition, we must not place it in those articles - so the are you truly in support of a unbalanced Wikipedia? --PaxEquilibrium 18:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:FSCG.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:FSCG.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Samobor

Please avoid starting articles from material from my website because all I get in return is Wikipedia is pushing me out of top spot battle of samobor and since my websites isn't considered reliable source that link will disappear during some spam cleanup (see my talk page). :-( --Ivan Bajlo 14:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did try to remove Croatian 104 Brigade which had only info taken from my website but I since it wasn't copied word for word I can only get backlink, not much comfort especially since they now have nofollow tag so I get no benefit of wikipedia's high page rank. :-(

Hopefully I'll hit jackpot on state lottery soon, then I can donate my entire website to Wikipedia and hire bunch of people to write instead of me. :-))

P.S. Could you only change name of External link to Reference or Source as that would be more correct - I could do that myself but then it would be Conflict of Interests. :-)) --Ivan Bajlo 15:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TFD of one of your templates

You should see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 6#Template:Croatia Squad 1996 European Championship — coelacan talk — 02:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

You have violated Wikipedia's 3-revert rule, twice, on the Republic of Ragusa article. I am not going to undo your removal of the category until I can get the name of it changed, but once I do that, I will report any further reversions by you. Αργυριου (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thewanderer.
Don't overreact.
Don't allow yourself to be intimidated by Argyriou's threats. See his contribution and comment on the article of Dubrovnik Republic [4]. Or the material on [5]. "Italian state"? He says that when Croatia/Croats claim the parts of Croatia, that thas's "imperialism"?
He brought a charge against himself there. There he prepared the arguments for a wiki-sentence against him.
Sam si je napisao optužnicu i pripremio si dokaze za wikipedijsku presudu protiv njega.
Have these links always in mind. Whenever he threatens you, remind him with things he wrote. Kubura 17:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Mandic

Do you have any source for his article?

P.S. Why do you almost never reply posts? --PaxEquilibrium 01:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VANDALISM

Do I have to remind that a language can have several dialects?

Spanish has Venezuelan and Argentinian, German has Swiss or Austrian, etc.

Linguists say Serbo-Croatian is only one language, and a neutral project has to follow serious guidelines, not political porpuses. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SISLEY (talk • contribs) 21:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It wasn't a lie we put both categories in Serbo-Croatian films, OK? I found a categorisation like that in another wikipedia.

What are you doing? This wikipedia is not only for you, but for all the people, you're starting being selfish with your behaviour, can't you realise?

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_13#Category:Croatian_language_films to discuss this. --Ed (Edgar181) 18:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Lord" Sekule Drljevic

Why do You think this category is POV? --PaxEquilibrium 20:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was written by a "patriot" to the like of those that frequently squirt around Ante Pavelić and Milan Nedić. Anyway, the mass-scale Chetnik (with Partisan aid subsequently) rebellion in Montenegro was characterized by a mass slaughter. Although under hard pressure from Rome and Berlin, Drljevic did authorize the execution each & every single Chetnik/Partisan freedom fighter. In addition to that, an investigation was held (known as "Sekule's purge") in which thousands of relatives/friends, those related in any kind to the Chetniks (children, women, you name it) were wiped out. Plus, we could attribute the fact that there's no Jew today in Montenegro and the great suffers of the Roms to Sekule, too. Although this is all too far controversial (as the figure was probably the very most "clean" of all of the Nazis' puppets); the fact that he remained loyal to the Axis forces to the very end does not contribute to his favor.

The Category was controversial, so they decided to put in it people who were convicted War Criminals, regardless if they are or not. Considering that he was sentenced by the Partisans, and that that was adopted by the World as legitimate, he does fall under that category. The controversy of Partisans' trials is known to me too. --PaxEquilibrium 20:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map: I was not aware that it was Mandic's creation, but neither did I note that Jevrem made it before. I noted that the whole political pamphlet was made by Jevrem's DANU, yeah. --PaxEquilibrium 00:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Repubbliche Marinare of Italy

I've proposed merging both Category:Maritime republics and Repubbliche Marinare into Category:Maritime Republics Αργυριου (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop destroying my contribution.

Please stop "destorying" my wikipage by inserting your own personal opinions on a subject you have no clue about.

I was born in raised in Kukar and you have no right to "deface" my page with your "opinions".

Hands Off!

KUKAR

Bulend Biščević

Hi, Thewanderer. I am the person who pproposed for deletion the article about Bulend Biščević. First of all I disagree with the fact that being an international player means the player is notable. However, I agree that if a player has played in a fully proffessional league then he is, according to WP:BIO. With good will, I am asking you, since I dont' want to have an edit war, is any of croatioan or bosnian leagues fully proffessional? At least I doubt about bosnian, since it is at the same level with cypriot which is not fully proffessional. Can you give me please some resources? User:KRBN 17:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the fact that he played for the best Croatian League. The question is if Croatian League is really a fully professional or not. If Hajduk is the best in a non-FULLY proffessional league then I don't suppose it is important for notability User:KRBN 00:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MNE

Is it just an accident, or You have an interest in my grandfatherland? :)) You edit it from time to time.

Or is it just a regular coincidence? ;)

Happy Easter!!! --PaxEquilibrium 16:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it's more of like You were over 'ere or have some connection to CG... --PaxEquilibrium 22:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ante Starčević

Thank you for your help with the Ante Starčević page; I couldn't believe the state of that article when I saw it, but obviously someone's been working very hard to keep it stained. I don't mind negotiating with people, but I can tell that the main culprit behind the reverts is a Croat-hater, judging by his other "contributions", many against Croatia. I was wondering though if you knew of a mediator or a good administrator that could help negotiate with the page. I am more than willing; but I will not stand by and just watch Starčević's page being bloated with the most obscene repetatives and massive quotations when other pages on convicted war criminals pale in comparison. Thanks for reading. --Jesuislafete 05:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Encyclopedia

Note that there are three encyclopedias by the name of "Croatian encyclopedia": the first issued by Josip Zach and Ivan Menzin (2 vols, Osijek, 1887), the second issued by Mate Ujević in Zagreb (5 vols, 1938-1945), and the third one described in the article above. So we'll probably need a disambiguation page for the term. --El Cazangero 20:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson

Sorry if I did anythin' wrong.

I just reverted removal. --PaxEquilibrium 22:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please!

The Ante Starcevic article is in the GA Review status! By editing it you are passing bad info to the reviewers and it is considered as a vandalism! If you continue - I will be forced to report it as an incident and seek gor the article protection!

--BarryMar 15:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't allow yourself to be provoked to do something stupid.
That's what they want you to.
Once they declare you as vandal, it'll be hard to wipe that etiquette off. Kubura 09:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AnteStarcevic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AnteStarcevic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

is at the template talk.--Methodius 22:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Montenegro

Why is there problem over this? I changed the obviously incorrect flag to a more correct version. The tricolor was banned by the Axis in Montenegro, and its usage was strictly banned. The *alaj-barjak* Montenegrin War Stag (which is the current Flag of the Republic of Montenegro) was adopted as the official state flag of this so-called "Kingdom of Montenegro". In the "Voice of Montenegrins" (Glas Crnogoraca) published it to the people of Montenegro under the article headed "New Flag of Montenegro": "With this occasion the High Commissioner notified the courageous officers that the Flag of Montenegro will be the War Stag of King Nicholas". --PaxEquilibrium 06:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link you presented seems to be down.

If true, it was probably the inter-period before they were all replaced with Nicholas' war flag. Considering that two Montenegrins were executed in the square of Cetinje for putting that flag as a mark of protest of the local fascistoid puppet regime on their homes. I think that the fact that Sekula's regime brought the deaths of almost 10,000 Montenegrins, and that using that flag (as a symbol of a free Montenegro, the stag of the anti-fascist Chetnik-Partisan 1941 rebellion) would be thus not only highly improper, but an insult to the victims of the Holocaust.

The current Montenegrin flag is no new design. In 2004 the Montenegrin Parliament adopted a slightly altered flag - the only difference being that the yellow color is now gold - and practically nothing more.

Where did I say that the current flag is same to that of the fascist puppet-state? It's true, it's almost identical - but it would be erratic not to recognize what it was in the actual beginning. I myself (or better, my family) possess(es) one Battle Stag of HRH Nicholas, earned in fighting the Ottoman Turks in ehem, "epic battles" (lol), so I would be insane if I had any dislike of the flag.

I think that this distrust actually comes from a tone of morality, justice and AFAIK - neutrality. I was and have forever remained the fierce opposer of irredentist ideologies promoted by Slobodan Milošević, Radovan Karadžić and their legacy - and I think that it in the end unfolds to a very sensible thing. --PaxEquilibrium 19:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Herzeg Bosnia.gif

Hello, Thewanderer. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Herzeg Bosnia.gif) was found at the following location: User:Thewanderer. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dinamo Zagreb Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dinamo Zagreb Logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dinamo Zagreb Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dinamo Zagreb Logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Etnofest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Etnofest.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Etnofest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Etnofest.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Union of Croatian Homeland War Volunteers Association

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Union of Croatian Homeland War Volunteers Association, by Laughing Man (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Union of Croatian Homeland War Volunteers Association seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Union of Croatian Homeland War Volunteers Association, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Croatian Association of Prisoners in Serbian Concentration Camps

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Croatian Association of Prisoners in Serbian Concentration Camps, by Laughing Man (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Croatian Association of Prisoners in Serbian Concentration Camps seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Croatian Association of Prisoners in Serbian Concentration Camps, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy delete abuse

What was the title of that other, speedily-deleted article? Just type the whole title even if it is a dead link now, so that I can check the deletion history. --Joy [shallot] 16:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind, I see it above. --Joy [shallot] 16:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, about that then. I am not familiar with ZUHDDR from the press. I know of UHDDR, is this their parent organization? That should be spelled out. Also, it would make sense to have an article for HVIDRA first, because that's a very well known organization. Also, an article for the Koordinacija udruga or whatever it's called, simply on the basis that they are the parent organization and nowadays a major stockholder union (so they're not just "emotionally" notable). --Joy [shallot] 16:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asaf Duraković

Re: your reference in the above article to "McGill University in Hamilton", please note that McGill University is in Montreal; the university in Hamilton, Ontario is called McMaster. Could you please clarify which university you mean and correct the article? Thanks. Bearcat 04:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:CanCroFolkloreFestival.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NK Troglav Crest.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Troglav Crest.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NK Brotnjo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Brotnjo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Etnofest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Etnofest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bilo jednom u Hrvatskoj.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bilo jednom u Hrvatskoj.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:CFU Logo.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CFU Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:UEFA Under-21.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFA Under-21.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:UEFA Futsal Cup.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFA Futsal Cup.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:KK Split.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KK Split.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:NK Zagreb Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Zagreb Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:NK Zadar Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Zadar Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:NK Osijek's Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Osijek's Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:NK Kamen Ingrad's Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Kamen Ingrad's Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hajduk's Logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hajduk's Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:HNL Logo.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HNL Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:HNK Cibalia's Logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HNK Cibalia's Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Inter Zapresic Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Inter Zapresic Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:HrvatskiDragovoljac.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HrvatskiDragovoljac.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:StAlbansSaints.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:StAlbansSaints.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Toronto Croatia Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Toronto Croatia Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Varteks' Logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Varteks' Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mostar

I think you should be interested in this.

A user is saying Mostar isn't majority croat even though there are sources to prove it. That user is Visca el barca and he is a sockpuppet. That user has been banned 7 time because of his nationalsit propaganda views. visit category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hahahihihoho

There were 3 source which are now deleted by Visca el barca. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.2.195 (talk) 15:18, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NK Pula Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Pula Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Jajce

user:Visca el barca has deleted respected User:DIREKTOR edits. He deleted referenced information on Jajce relating to the 2004 census. He left a message saying "clean bullshit". I think this is not approriate.

user:Visca el barca has been warned for attacking another user. this

Hopefully you can revert the vandalism. I would of asked User:DIREKTOR but on his user page it says he is taking a break to study for exams. Franjo r 02:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He deleted it again. He doesn't want to listen. Franjo r 15:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Official in Croatia

As per your deletion of the cyrillic spelling on the article Kukar read Article 12 of Ustav Republike Hrvatske (2001) it reads in Croatian: Članak 12.

U Republici Hrvatskoj u službenoj je uporabi hrvatski jezik i latinično pismo.

U pojedinim lokalnim jedinicama uz hrvatski jezik i latinično pismo u službenu se uporabu može uvesti i drugi jezik te ćirilično ili koje drugo pismo pod uvjetima propisanima zakonom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kukar (talk • contribs) 14:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Lies About Jasenovac

At Jasenovac concentration camp, Serb editors have conveniently "avoided" reporting the following figure from the United States Holocaust Museum about Serb victims of Holocaust: "The most reliable figures place the number of Serbs killed by the Ustaša between 330,000 and 390,000, with 45,000 to 52,000 Serbs murdered in Jasenovac." Serb editors have deleted this part from the article because it's more convenient to believe in a myth of 700,000 Serbs dead even though the United States Holocaust museum has stated that the most reliable figures place the number of Serbs killed in Jasenovac to 45,000-52,000. Source http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/jasenovac/frameset.html?L= .

One more thing: The Bosniak Institute in Zürich published in 1998 a list of all registered victims of the two concentration camps on the basis of data drawn from the Office for Statistics in Belgrade. This gives a figure of 59,188 known deaths at Jasenovac and Stara Gradiška, of which 33,944 were Serbs.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosniak (talk • contribs) 20:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Persumable Croatian and Bosnian percentage in bosnian municipalities 2005

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Persumable Croatian and Bosnian percentage in bosnian municipalities 2005, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Persumable Croatian and Bosnian percentage in bosnian municipalities 2005 is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Persumable Croatian and Bosnian percentage in bosnian municipalities 2005, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

some thoughts

Its good that you contribute by making new articles like Rock za Hrvatsku or Croatian pop and rock scene but in some cases you just copy already existing stuff which i think is not right and may be misunderstood by someone as content forking. Also there are some factual errors, Osmi Putnik were formed in 1985, they are not from the 1970s and so on. I think that article (cropoprock) will need some working, so I'll try to contribute as much as I can. There are so many artists that need to be mentioned Kico Slabinac, the festival scene Splitski festival, Opatija, Dubrovacki trubaduri and all that. Also the chronological order is definetly not a good idea for this particular article as currently there is no enough information to fill every subsection properly (for example your 1970s subsection contains only one sentence). I'll try to do something, i hope for a constructive cooperation --Dzole 17:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I also suggest renaming the article to Croatian popular music as some of the artists like Arsen Dedic for instance are not just "pop", nor rock.--Dzole 19:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stedimlija

Ante Pavelic, quote, 5 June 1942, conversation with Gregory Ivanovic Maksimov, the Russian exile to-be Head of the Croatian Orthodox Church:

Eh! Here they are! I forgot to say this sir, mister Archbishop. This is Savic Markovic Stedimlija, journalist, the first feather of Zagreb. He will be your right hand. And this is Andrija Artukovic, minister of internal affairs. Artukovic was highly unwilling to assign to you Stedimlija, that was his best man in the Section for Propaganda. Only on my insisting he complied to hand him over to you. I hope you will cooperate with him well. You will handle ecclesiastic, religious affairs, finding priests, and all factual matters, especially propaganda, will be handled by Stedimlija... --PaxEquilibrium 15:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Hajduk's_Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Hajduk's_Logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nedic Serbia

Sorry for reverting but last table has been with problems because of words military occupation. Now when I have added neutral, serbian source it will be very hard to delete that it has been state. Rjecina) 16:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know...

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Giovanni_Giove/personale

AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sekula & Anthem

Otkada je Badnje Veče
Našu vjeru očistilo,
Među nama, seljacima,
Nevjernika nije bilo.

This is celebration of what the Muslim world today (for instance Bosniacs in our lands) consider genocide. It celebrates the cleansing of Muslims from Montenegro on one particular moment that occurred in the 18th century (na Badnje Veče 1702), celebrating the "purification" (Orthodox-pure probably) of the faith, with no infidels. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, please don't make such blatant accusations for vandalism, refer to WP:VAND.

Also why do you think that Sekula's atrocities are extremely (!) controversial? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well on Wikipedia there already is lengthy reference to the Muslim cleansing celebration in the The Mountain Wreath article - so yeah, of course I'll have nothing against you adding it on the Petar II Petrovic Njegos article. AFAIK I endorse adding at least some reference to it. Just keep please two things on your mind. One :that is that in the 18th century and around them the national-romantic feelings against Islam as well as the blatant fact that such thoughts have long disappeared by the 1940s and the age of Sekula Drljevic (when THEN it was immoral too like today), which depicts that solely because of his personal nationalist beliefs (when in the meantime already voices against crimes against Muslims that occurred emerged). And Two: Petar just depicts an occasion, during which one Montenegrin Duke speaks how he expelled the Turks (a term even separated from the poturicas), defeated them and destroyed a part of their property - hardly a celebration of the event directly from Njegos. On the other hand Sekula without doubt depicts celebration of the cleansing of infidels.

Well the Yugoslav State Commission affirmed that in early 1945, tried him for collaboration and treason (in Montenegro), for propaganda (in the anti-Allied Frontiersmen paper) and for crimes (in Sajmiste). If you desire, I believe I can find a direct citation, as well as perhaps scan the indictment (with verdict) against Sekule?

He wasn't really a totally marginal person, but yes, he was a marginal person in the WWII perpetrated atrocities. He didn't befriend simply, he worked at the Sajmiste concentration camp between 1941 and 1944. After it was closed, he moved to Zagreb because of the advancing Allies. His attempt hardly failed, because even though lasting for a day, the Government survived as the Chetniks made compromise with the Italians and Blazo Djukanovic (day later after the Chetniks expelled him) became Prime Minister. Although his hands are not totally clean on the retreating and the Chetniks matter, I do not aim at that at all - the issue is that he was an accomplice in the Holocaust at the Sajmiste concentration camp from 1941 to 1944 and that he in 1944 to 1945 organized removals of families, including tens of thousands of people from Montenegro, guaranteeing protection across NDH territory. The families were those related to the Chetniks in any way who feared the incoming and strongly victorious Partisans. However, they were all shipped to the Jasenovac and Stara Gradiska concentration camps. Today some (nationalist, pro-Axis WWII) modern voices are trying to speak good words about Sekule claiming that he didn't know what was going to happen, but they base this on absolutely nothing - there is no such record. According to the texts issued by the Communists during Yugoslavia, he was even an instrument (deal) with the Ustashas to find "souls" for extermination (overstretched, but still).

No of course, I didn't think that. Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EuropeanPatentConvention2008.PNG

Hi! Thanks for the nice map. Just a small (tiny, really) note, after zooming on Liechtenstein, it seems this country is in grey, while it should be in green. Cheers. --Edcolins (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian flag

I have look internet about Serbian flag and this are my findings: On Serbian wiki Nedic' Serbia flag is is possible to see on this place . Latter they have deleted comments about flag but .... I have seen that flag on 2 sites. If we look in not so distant future best site for Serbian flags it will be this, but I think that you know that. This site is having interesting grb (croato-serbian) of Nedic Serbia. Cheers. --Rjecina (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other flag I have seen only on 1 site so this shown before must be right.--Rjecina (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmable. That is correct. That was the fascist flag of Nedic's "Salvation" government, depicting its (with no other details) Coat of Arms in the middle. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Country data Yugoslavia

Hi! I really have nothing to do with the country data templates, I just mass-protected all of them due to the risk of vandalism. You question would be better asked over at the relevant WikiProject. east.718 at 01:15, December 31, 2007

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CFU Logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:CFU Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Milomoje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Milomoje.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KK Split.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KK Split.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StAlbansSaints.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:StAlbansSaints.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VK Jug.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VK Jug.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UEFA Futsal Cup.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFA Futsal Cup.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UEFA Under-21.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFA Under-21.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RK Zagreb.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:RK Zagreb.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slagalica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slagalica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Križanović

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Tommy Križanović, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are totally unacceptible.

You cannot honestly believe that my reverting vandalism is justification for you to make inappropriate comments. If you continue to do so, I have no choice but to conclude that you are not interested in WP:AGF, WP:CONS, or anything of the sort, and I will report you to the ANI for picking up where the IP-vandal left off. --Cheeser1 (talk) 03:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and report. I'd love to see you lose. Thewanderer, I will contact some other Croatian Wikipedia users to try to get them to help with the page. This ridiculousness has gone on long enough. --Jesuislafete (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK notice

On 10 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lepoglava prison, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HRK Izvidjac.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:HRK Izvidjac.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Independent State of Croatia

I have edited this article. Because my english s not very good can you please edit my english language mistakes in part of article background (which is new). --Rjecina (talk) 02:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia (1941-1944) article

You have claimed that Serbia was a state from 1941 to 1944 based on the fact that it had its own currency, post, etc. Evidence from a number of reputable sources which I have provided indicate that it was not a state, but a military regime of Nazi Germany. the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia had currency and armed forces, but was not a state, Reichskommissariat Norwegen (Norway) had a Norwegian government but was not a state, German governors administered it. It appears obvious that Nedic wanted the territory to be recogonized as a Serbian state, but there is no evidence that Hitler agreed. This article is very controversial, if you have clear evidence to suggest it was a state please present it, but keep in mind that Bohemia and Moravia is an example of a German-occupied region that had a currency, which was not a state.--R-41 (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do clearly understand that Nedic definately intended it to be a state which I agree should be clear in the article. I think one thing has to be made clear as it is confusing for a number of people, is that Italy was the Axis power which made the most puppet states - the Independent State of Croatia, the Kingdom of Montenegro, and the Hellenic State (Greece). Hitler did not even want to take on a Balkan campaign, he was more interested in a war against the Soviet Union. Nor did Hitler wish to create any Slavic puppet state, he deemed all Slavic people to be racially inferior, it was Mussolini who saw value in a Balkan campaign and Balkan puppet states to expand his Italian Empire. Mussolini convinced Hitler to pursue a Balkan campaign to save the Italian campaign in Greece. Germany initially only created two puppet states, Vichy France and Slovakia, though later made puppet states in Hungary and Italy as they gave up to the Allies. All the rest of occupied territories had German leadership with local civil governments in a Reichskommissariat for instance, a Nazi party official would run the territory, in the example of the Military Administration in Belgium and North France a military commander was the official governor of the territory. The French Franc was still in circulation in northern France. Also in France, much of the territory was not intended for immediate German annexation and Vichy France laid claim to the area. It seems that these military administrations were used in areas which needed subduing. Northern France had a strong underground resistance movement and Serbia was politically unstable and had strong resistance movements, Tito's Partisans controlled a section of Serbia for a long period of time in what was known as the "Republic of Uzice" I believe. Also the Germans may not have been willing to give Nedic's government independence due to the German government's support of the German population in Banat, which had autonomy from Nedic's regime. It is possible that the German government was unsure of what to do with Banat as well as the continuing resistance, that they still legally ran the territory as a military administration. But you are correct that Nedic did want Serbia to be a state, and in many ways it behaved like one. But we must remember that the Germans were firmly in charge, and their rule over the region had far more power than that of Nedic.--R-41 (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the matter of the Partisans having stronger holds in Bosnia and Croatia than in Serbia was largely to do with the geographical terrain, there were mountains and caves which Partisans could hide in in Bosnia and Croatia, as for Serbia, I am unsure of its geographical layout, but Croatia and Bosnia had tactical advantages for the Partisans. I certainly would note that the Partisan's would have an easier time winning in the terrains of Bosnia and Croatia than in flat areas of Serbia, which were home to the Chetniks who violently opposed the Partisans.--R-41 (talk) 02:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Order of Crown of Zvonimir.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Order of Crown of Zvonimir.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit for Serbs in Canada

In your edit note you mentioned that the new census results were recently released in Canada. I've been trying to update the info oin Demographics of Toronto page. If you could inform me as to where I could find detailed census results, I'd appreciate it. The page is completely lacking in data on the significant South Slavic community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkmx (talk • contribs) 15:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.Gkmx (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Serbian collaborators

Category:Serbian collaborators, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oj Hrvatska Mati

Lyrics has been published on site with green lights from this site. Because of copyright lyrics are not allowed on wikipedia. This has been decided with "Ustaša" song which is having copyright from 1943 (?). If song is older of 70 years lyrics are allowed but in other situations ...--Rjecina (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Col. Marko Mesic

I do not understand your insisting on replacing my new sourced biography of Marko Mesic with old unverified stories based on unverified internet articles.

Version I am trying to publish is based on book http://www.naklada-ljevak.hr/knjiga/show/id/2079 published by the Croatian State Archives and numerous aritcles in mainstream Croatian press. If you wish I can scan relevant pages and publish it here?

Version you are trying to push is based on unverified internet articles.

Yes it is unbelievable but true fact that Mesic lived to old age ....... see http://www.gradskagroblja.hr/Trazilica/MapPreview.aspx?CemeteryID=1&Field=50&DeptID=1&PersonID=227619.

If you have to ...... you can continue to revert to your unverified version based on unverified rumours published on the net as 'sources'.

Everybody in Croatia and further uses verified Croatian State Archives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.74.185 (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NK Zagreb Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NK Zagreb Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Storm

I have lost patience with discussion on talk page. Discussion has started because of SPA account which has wanted that Veritas become source for article and now we are having discussion which source are good for this article. On talk page I have declared that today is last day of my discussions and that somebody will take my place. I am asking you and 1 another editor.--Rjecina (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template question

I would like to move Croatian diaspora articles from {{Croats}} and create separate {{Croatian diaspora}} template similar to {{Polish diaspora}} template, to group all Croats living abroad. What do you think? It seems to me it is a standard to group similar ethnic group articles by the navigation box at the bottom. - Darwinek (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cro

Actually, it was, but it in truth didn't have a single man on Montenegrin soil or controlled any Montenegrin Orthodox religious institution, so I'm not sure whether it counts. Does it?

The Montenegrin National Council published all official data in Old-style Croatian (preferred by the Ustashas). All the other informal publishing too, an example is the "Tko su Srbi?" racist philosophical work. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first (State Council), not the latter (in occupied Montenegro in effect there was no government). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HNK Cibalia's Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HNK Cibalia's Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naprijed vatreni!

Hello. Have you considered creating template for Croatia national team managers, similar to {{Germany national football team managers}}? - Darwinek (talk) 10:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:Standshown

I am sure that you will be interested to hear that your old friend Standshown is back--Rjecina (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To end edit warring in article Magnum Crimen I am calling all editors of this article for vote on talk page--Rjecina (talk) 22:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julienne Bušić

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to move Julienne Bušić by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 16:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zagreb task force

Ako te zanima: prijedlog za Task force Zagreb --Admiral Norton ^(talk) 18:41, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hrvatski Kup.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hrvatski Kup.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HNK Rijeka's Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HNK Rijeka's Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Croatia 2009 World Handball.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Croatia 2009 World Handball.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GradjanskiZagreb.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:GradjanskiZagreb.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stepinac

Because you are editing article about Stepinac.....

On wiki we are having many articles about Roman Catholic Church and Ustaše, but now I am having 1 second hand source (Yes it is POV source, but...) which is speaking about number of priest declared guilty by Yugoslav courts 1945-46:

"Dokumenti o protunarodnom radu i zločinima jednog dijela katoličkog klera (Zagreb 1946.) u kojima se nabraja 429 svećenika, redovnika i časnih sestara, koji su protunarodno radili i počinili zločine". [6]--Rjecina (talk) 03:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brought down Yugoslavia?

"This user is proud of helping bring down the artificial state of Yugoslavia."
A rather haughty proclamation, that :) With all due respect, Wanderer, not a single soldier or civilian fighting in the Croatian War of Independence brought Yugoslavia one inch closer to its dissolution. The Croatian soldiers did not fight against SFR Yugoslavia, because there was no SFR Yugoslavia by the time of the war. The soldiers on the Croatian side fought against Serbian rebels inflamed by (greater-)Serbian nationalism, ironically, the very thing that began destroying SFR Yugoslavia down well before the Domovinski rat. Unless of course, you talked Račan into leaving the congress, or Tuđman into declaring independence, or Milošević into supporting the nationalists... --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 09:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see, your contribution appears significant after all. However, it was Milošević, not Tuđman, that stirred the Croatian people in SR Croatia towards independence. Tuđman just happened to be at the right time and place to exploit the general fear of Serbian nationalism.

Concerning "traditions", I do not have a Partisan or communist family tradition, if that's what you were referring to. Quite the contrary, my family was always quite conservative and (irretrievably) lost a lot of property to the nationalization. The fundamental misunderstanding, I deem, lies in the fact that you believe that supporting Yugoslavia means supporting communism. As I keep repeating: I do not support communism, I support western-style capitalism and democracy. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 15:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, if you can find me a symbol of Yugoslavia without communist symbolism that hasn't been used by greater-Serbian nationalists, I'll gladly use it immediately. The historical meaning of the white-checkered coat of arms has unfortunately been altered by the Ustaše, just like the pan-slavic flag (without the red star) now represents Serbian hegemonism. Lets not fool ourselves, few will see them both for what they really represent. While I do believe that the era of the SFR Yugoslavia has been the best possible historical outcome of World War II (between the Karađorđevićes and Stalin), to support communism in modern times is ridiculous as it can only be harmful to a country. There is no doubt that Croatia benefited immensely from Yugoslavia, and economic befit is the only guideline I deem significant. If I had it "my way", we'd have a western-democratic federation of republics each free to elect its own government and parliament (the HSS, the HDZ, etc...), but united in the economic and military areas to provide the greatest possible prosperity this region can achieve. However, I'm not so sure you are opposed to Yugoslavia solely due to its communist ideology? If that were so, our beliefs would be very similar, but you appear to be driven in this opposition by a strong feeling of nationalist pride that has done nothing but hurt the quality of life of the Croatian people whenever it rears its ugly head. Of course, it is too easy to disregard the "quality of life factor" when one lives thousands of miles away... --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 07:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea when exactly your family emigrated, but the quality of life in Croatia was certainly and drastically increased in SFR Yugoslavia. I'm not going to go into the well known details about Yugoslavia's non-aligned policy and how it beneficially effected the lifestyle of everyone around here, but anyone who thinks himself a realist must accept the success of the economic and diplomatic policies of the Yugoslav government. Do I believe Serbs and Croats are one people? Again any realist, no matter the political affiliation, will admit that Croats and Serbs are amongst the most similar of the myriad European ethnic groups. Certainly when compared to your very historic example of Hungarians, or Germans, or Bulgarians for that matter. Two ethnic groups so utterly similar have the possibility to create a greater whole, as cultural differences, the main barrier between nations, are reduced by this similarity to an obstacle easily surmountable by good-will and tolerance.

"I am opposed to Yugoslavia because I see it is an abomination and a negation of my nationality."

Yes I got that part, I still don't see, however, how you perceive a loose economic union as any threat to the Croatian nationality? To quote Franjo Tuđman, Josip Broz Tito established the equality (ravnopravnost) of the Croatian people in Yugoslavia. While all you say may have been true about the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the second Yugoslavia could have served as a middle-phase between the fiercely unitarianist version and the tolerant democratic version of the union.

"...it is certain the state would never have been formed (or ever will be again) by democratic means,..."

This is your own personal opinion not based on any real argument. You perceive Yugoslavia as a threat to your nationality, so naturally it must be a threat to democracy as well. I'm afraid I do not see your logic there. The seven new countries currently formed out of one large entity can never achieve as much prosperity as they could united. Much like the fifty states of the United States of America can never be as powerful and prosperous alone as they can together. This principle is not my own, but is also the main force in modern European politics, which realize the importance of economic unification (not forgetting NAFTA, but that's a whole different matter). The differences between New Yorkers and Louisianians (for example) can easily be compared to that between Serbs and Croats, and if I'm not mistaken, they also had their violent episode. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 16:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know this whole discussion is getting pointless and over-long. I'll just add in conclusion that it is always interesting to talk to Croatian and Serbian emigrants in Canada and Australia (curiously not so in the US). It is interesting because they both more often than not turn out to be fiercely nationalist and "Croatia/Serbia-loving", but inevitably keep their distance from the real consequences their own, exported and then imported, ideology has wrought upon these troubled parts of Europe. Expectedly, they more often than not also have strong, unshakable illusions about the Croatian people, unable to comprehend the fact that very many despise nationalism because of the misery and poverty it brought to Croatian and Serbian lives. This, of course, is simply because they themselves are "safe" from this same brand of nationalism-induced poverty and misery. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 07:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accession of Croatia to NATO

		The NATO Barnstar
		Excellent idea for an article, and its a good start. I bet there's a bunch more that could be added, including a history section, and maybe a background or context section. Best! Patrick «» 21:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to Thewanderer by Patrick «» on 21:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stjepan Horvat

A tag has been placed on Stjepan Horvat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongo matic 02:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of British Serbs

An article that you have been involved in editing, British Serbs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatian British. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Croatian British

An article that you have been involved in editing, Croatian British, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatian British. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

I haven't tried to share my knowledge on here for a while because of users like DIREKTOR etc making it virtually impossible so I don't even care if I get banned for writing this, but, you're a (censored). I'm coming back to edit what I said because I was a little harsh. I see you have tried to talk some sense into DIREKTOR etc. but I still don't see how you can be a Croat and anti- "U" as you have on your profile page - to top it off, not many Croats here in Canada recognized the legitimacy of BiH, and if they do, they are usually newcomers and yugos, so this too puzzles me on your front page. I would never put up an artificial flag designed by some Belgian graphic designer and associate myself with such a banana country which is another prison of Croats, but whatever, suit yourself. AP1929 (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mirko Kokotović = Miroslav Kokotović?

Hi! I have a simple question for you as you speak Croatian: Do you think Mirko Kokotović who was a Yugoslav/Croatian football managers is the Miroslav Kokotović here or the Kokotovic there. The question is: is it the same guy?? It would help me if you find an answer...Thanks!--Latouffedisco (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Central Bureau of Statistics

May I suggest moving the article to Central Bureau of Statistics (Croatia)? "Central Bureau of Statistics" is its proper name, as quoted in the article itself, as well as on the Bureau's website. GregorB (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Huda Jama

Very good!! As soon as I have some time, I will try to expand it. The Slovenian press has covered the issue quite extensively, so I think it won't be difficult to find enough sources. I think we might consider to start an article on the nearby Teharje concentration camp, where the victims were interned before they were transported to Huda Jama. Best regards, Viator slovenicus (talk) 23:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! There have been discussions to move the Huda Jama article. Could you check out the discussion page and give your opinion on the issue. Thanks. Viator slovenicus (talk) 23:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Hokej

Good day my friend. You added a tag about something unusual about the croatian and serbian hockey leagues uniting. There is little info on this, but there is a new league called the Panonian League, and it has teams from both countries in it. Maybe this is the unified league? I don't know. Here's a list of some incomplete standings... http://www.webng.com/hokejusrbiji/2009/tabele.htm Cheers!, and may we yugoslavs in Canada help get hockey to be more popular back in our motherlands. :) (LAz17 (talk) 23:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)). One more link, in case that one is fishy. http://forums.internationalhockey.net/showthread.php?t=5746 So, if people are talking about it and posting new results, then it probably is something real. The thing that I wonder is what will happen to the leagues in serbia and croatia? Will they fold into this one bigger league and still keep their national championships separate? I don't know. (LAz17 (talk) 23:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)). Looks like the croat hockey leage is dead? One team left to go to the slovenian league, and the other two joined with the serbs. http://www.hrhokej.net/panonska-liga.html , http://www.hrhokej.net/panonska-liga/clanci-panonska/298-panonska-liga-ima-li-budunosti.html (LAz17 (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)). Little update, looks like the combined league finished their "second" season recently. (LAz17 (talk) 01:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)). Well I guess I'm done for now, added the last team page and who knows when I'll get back to this. You should consider looking into what happened to KHL Karlovac and making a page about the third croat team that is in the slovenian league. (LAz17 (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

Information

Hello to you. You may be interested in the activities of one repeated vandal who is disrupting the common codes of our standard editing, particularly regarding certain ethnic Croatian football players. Do you remember this edit you submitted? [7], only for your own contribution to be reverted. Presumably that page was not on your watchlist, and not mine either; however that same user, now using a different IP has been at war with me personally for nearly two weeks. I've tried to draw attention to it but the admins are asleep. Our friend doesn't seem to like any mention of present day lands on infoboxes nor on main text space. He thinks that as it is not relevant to himself, it isn't relevant to anybody. Just have a look at some of these pathetic contributions: [8]. Now the same user uses a different IP, just look at these works of art: [9]. The contributions of one IP is devoted to reverting my edits. Anyhow, I thought you'd be interested in light in the nature of some of your own editing. I'm not so much inviting you to take part in this ongoing war, but if you could, do you think you can atleast keep an eye on one or two of the pages? Atleast Danijel Subašić; that one has been switched back and forth so much these past days that the history is now dominated by me and the IPs, yet nothing new has been added. If you catch the vandal before I do, you may wish to follow his little trail. If you do decide to do this, it's best to wait until the little shit has gone, otherwise it will just be a live edit war as I had three days ago. Where-as you and I have stable accounts, the antagonist can forever hide behind new IPs. I'd appreciate your help; if these things don't interest you so much, then I apologise for the disturbance. All the best. Evlekis (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea and thanks, I'm glad to have your support on this. In the meantime, we'll all concentrate on the more important issues. Regards. Evlekis (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Croatian Column 1945.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Croatian Column 1945.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Croats in the United Kingdom

I have nominated Croats in the United Kingdom, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croats in the United Kingdom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dalmatian elections

Thanks for fixing that. I was just trying to tie up all the disconnected content, didn't really check it. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commission on Concealed Mass Graves in Slovenia

Hi Thewanderer! Just a friendly recommendation here, I think that the article needs more attention. Please check Talk Page [10] Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Milas (politician)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ivan Milas (politician). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcasm

Ah, but of course, for the fascist émigrés the prison camps holding the Ustaše militiamen are "concentration camps", and executing them for high treason during wartime is the "holocaust". The people in those POW camps were executed by due process of both pre-war and post-war law, which states unambiguously that any person found guilty of high treason during wartime shall be put to death. Of course, most of the guilty persons were released under the several amnesties of the parliament, but the rest were tried for the crimes against their state.

You know, there's a reason why nationalists stick to mentioning Bleiburg only, and not the rest of your "mass killings". Its because the rest were actually required by Yugoslav law (and the law of any other country at the time - high treason during wartime = death sentence). --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 12:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't sentences usually come after trials ? AP1929 (talk) 17:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Niko Bete

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Niko Bete. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Bete. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the President of Croatia

Thanks for this article; could you please reference it? Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Badnjak

I know you are great with history, so do you happen to have any information on the history of badnjak? Some users are trying to claim it' a Serbian tradition only. --Jesuislafete (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Thewanderer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 13 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 687 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jurica Puljiz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ratko Perić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ivano Balić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Berislav Rončević - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jasmin Stavros - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elvis Scoria - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Faruk Buljubašić Fayo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Balša Brković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jasmin Repeša - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Aleksandar Bečanović - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Nikola Plećaš 12. Ozren Bonačić 13. Ivan Milas (politician)

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia U-21 template

Hello, I've noticed you've created the Template:Croatia national under-21 football team managers with Novoselac, Ladić and Bilić. However, I'm pretty sure that Ivo Šušak also coached the team, probably some time in between Novoselac's and Ladić's tenure. This should be researched and included in the template. Cheers. Timbouctou (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I took the liberty of checking data for U-21 matches and according to match reports that the team plaed in the qualifiers for big tournaments, Ladić assumed tenure in 2006, Bilić was manager from 2004 to 2006, Novoselac from 2000 to 2004 and Šušak was before Novoselac. Šušak led the team in the 1998-200 period and at the 2000 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship. I have no data for the period prior to 1998. Timbouctou (talk) 14:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AllSerbia

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as AllSerbia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tadija (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Augustinčić

Hello there. As you may have noticed I've tried to develop Augustinčić's article beyond the usual stub. I appreciate your input, but I'm really not sure whether the thing about him making a bust of Pavelić should be included in it as it may be harmful if unreferenced. The list of Augustinčić's monuments does not mention anything about Pavelić's bust, and the only thing I get when googling it are wikipedia mirrors. It would seem that the thing was never erected publicly anywhere, there are no photos of it and the museum that is based on Augustinčić's life and work doesn't mention it anywhere. All we are left with is a pretty unclear remark by Vlatko Pavletić published in Vijenac and Djilas's memoir - which may or may not be true, as memoirs usually go, and cannot be checked by other editors anyway. I mean, the gallery site lists dozens of other sculptures, dedicated to all sorts of people from King Alexander to the Red Army and Ethiopian partisans which could be mentioned and verified easily, so I see no reason to insist on mentioning a sculpture of a fascist leader which may or may not have existed. Unless more credible reference is added I will remove this. Also, the statement that he was elected to the National Assembly could use a reference too. When did his term end and was he elected again? Cheers. Timbouctou (talk) 04:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Hi, I've left you a message on my talk page. Timbouctou (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inform

I inform you: read user talk:Jimbo Wales#Ex Yugoslavia case —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HSS

Acrually, it's HSS who are misspelling their own name in their official website. It should be the Croatian Peasants' Party, not the Croatian Peasant Party. I actually translate things like these for a living. And btw, parties are always headed by chairmen, not presidents. I will accept your argument that the quite redundant adjective should be there and change ministers' party designation to abbreviations. I really think there is no point in telling the reader reading the article which in its title has the word Croatia, and in which the very first sentence tells them that they are reading an article about a CROATIAN ministry that the past 10 ministers came from Croatian parties. It's rather unlikely that we would ever have a minister from the Peasants' Party (Romania). Timbouctou (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosor cabinet

Hello, Thewanderer. You have new messages at Timbouctou's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Timbouctou (talk) 15:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edvard Broz

The article Edvard Broz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear why he's a fugitive and why he's notable. DWI is not a major crime.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: brza cesta

Please see Talk:Highways in Croatia#official list of all brza cesta. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Edvard Broz

I have nominated Edvard Broz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edvard Broz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Polargeo (talk) 13:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1918

Wanderer, I've done my share of silly edits but this new sort of POV-pushing you've just invented now goes against half the Yugoslav history articles on Wikipedia (and the sources therein). I'll be brief: ALL sources state that "Yugoslavia" was formed in 1918, and NO sources postulate that the creation of "Yugoslavia" took place in 1929. Either way, take these new ideas to Talk:Kingdom of Yugoslavia and/or Talk:Creation of Yugoslavia (since both those articles directly contradict you), get your sources and brace for a thorough discussion. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The exact name of the country is irrelevant, I'm not about to get into a huge discussion on names (yes, I know it was opposed - particularly by Greater Serbia proponents). If we agree that "Yugoslavia was established in 1918", why are you removing text that states the "formation of the first Yugoslavia takes place in 1918"? I particulartly like the conspiracy theory about my evil plan to promote the "Yugoslavia was established in 1918" propaganda.

Re:"From the perspective of 1918 or 1921, Yugoslavia 'did not exist' because that was simply not the country's name yet." Are we in 1919? Are we supposed to represent the "perspective" of the interbellum or that of modern historiography? --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 23:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Austrian Empire, Austro-Hungarian Empire; Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Just follow the wikilinks. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 00:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Croatia–Estonia relations

The article Croatia–Estonia relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of any real notability on English Wikipedia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 23:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just gone through the Croatian category, and instantly thought - Estonia? Mongolia? Foreign relations aficionados have gone overboard :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Stepinac COA.png

Thank you for uploading File:Stepinac COA.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Stepinac Germanicum.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Stepinac Germanicum.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Stepinac Germanicum.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Stepinac Germanicum.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Croatia–Estonia relations

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Croatia–Estonia relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Estonia relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Faruk Buljubašić

Hello, I wanted to ask if you are able to help with this article. You created it years ago, but it has been tagged as unreferenced for three years. Any help you can give would be appreciated. Thanks, Markiewp (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hladno Pivo and Daleka Obala

I believe that these bands can be included into the Category:Yugoslav punk rock bands and Category:Yugoslav rock bands. Hladno Pivo were formed in 1987, and had first success with the appearance of their tape Hladno pivo in 1991. Daleka Obala definitely should be included into Category:Yugoslav rock bands, as they released their debut album in 1990. Additionally, Petar Janjatovic included both bands into his Ex YU Rock Enciklopedija in the part about SFR Yugoslavia. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnia elections 2010

It seems you are from Bosnia, i was wondering how well versed your are in local politics to fill out the section about the parties. Seems like there are 39 parties, and it would be nice to say its political base contextLihaas (talk) 03:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Croats infobox picture

There is a parallel discussion about 'Croats infobox picture' at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia and Talk:Croats. Your comments and suggestions will be appreciated. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 19:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox picture

Discuss about infobox picture of article "Croats" here.--Wustefuchs (talk) 11:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion at Yugoslav Front

FYI, the idea of renaming/returning the article to Yugoslavia in World War II has been presented as a third option at the the move discussion for Yugoslav Front.--Labattblueboy (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Nazor

Hello, I have to inform you that Mr. Nazor both was head of state and head of the legislature. This was a common practice with regard to all the wartime legislatures of Yugoslavia. 1953-1974 the chairmen of the state parliaments also served as heads of the republics. I have found a source [11] which confirms that the ZAVNOH was the predecessor of Sabor. Best wishes! Mbakkel2 18. february 2011 kl 23:39 (CET)

File copyright problem with File:Bombing of Zagreb, 1944.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bombing of Zagreb, 1944.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Croatian Panzer I.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Croatian Panzer I.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Light Transport Brigade.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Light Transport Brigade.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jadran je nas.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jadran je nas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YSL

Please stop blanking info, as you have been at Yugoslav Sign Language. It is disruptive. — kwami (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zagreb Synagogue

Thanks for the Stepinac quote - I originally wanted to include it, but I didn't have a good source (Žubrinić's web site only). Do you happen to have the book page number? GregorB (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page number added. It's my own translation though, so you may want to make another go at it. The quote reads (sans diacritics - they're such a pain to insert manually): "Kuca Bozja bilo koje vjere je sveta stvar i tko u to dira, taj ce zivotom platiti. I na ovom i na onom svijetu bit ce proganjan."--Thewanderer (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GregorB (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've got template that could be interesting to you

This user is a
Croat of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

--Wustenfuchs (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Subdivisions of Austria-Hungary

Template:Subdivisions of Austria-Hungary has been nominated for merging with Template:Provinces of the Austrian Empire. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 16:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bosniaks: Images of notable Bosniaks for the Template:Bosniaks infobox

Please, join the discussion.

Regards, --Wusten fuchs 11:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval croatian army

I would like to create this Article.--190.233.214.227 (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP Croatia in the Signpost

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Croatia for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inter Zapresic Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inter Zapresic Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HRK Izvidjac.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HRK Izvidjac.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Etnofest Neum

The article Etnofest Neum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced music festival article of unclear notability; tagged as unreferenced since 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hrvatski Kup.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hrvatski Kup.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 23:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Vladimir Dedijer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhineback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comrade

You know I report folks for stuff like that, right? Cut it out. -- Director (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. You find my use of a defunct Communist term offensive? Totally understandable. Perhaps you understand why other users find your pushing of defunct Communist Party terminology on Wikipedia with no support from foreign or modern local sources offensive and inaccurate as well? Here's hoping.--Thewanderer (talk) 00:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lazo M. Kostić

Excuse me, but political views of an author are not "evidence" that this author cannot write an credible work about certain subjects. This book written by him that you removed from the article is practically an demographic analysis of data from various censuses and other sources that also mention data from these censuses are confirming that Kostić did not forged these numbers. You should first read the book and then decide whether it is valuable or credible source or not. PANONIAN 10:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zadarfest

The article Zadarfest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced music festival article of unclear notability; tagged as unreferenced since 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mladen Lorković

Can you please add a name of Bartulin's book in the "Bibliography" section in the "References" section.

And thx for fixing my spelling mistakes and adding a very important info to the article. It's really hard to find infos for Lorković and at the same time to make an article out if them. Literature is so stingy. :D --Wusten fuchs 17:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Also, it's not a book, it's from an article. I've referenced it accordingly.--Thewanderer (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see. I haven't saw that at first. Well, everything is just fine then. --Wusten fuchs 17:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

move of Government of National Salvation (Serbia)

G'day. I have started a discussion on the talk page of the article regarding your move. I can't see how this move could possibly be based in WP:TITLE policy, but I am open minded if you can show it is the WP:COMMONNAME or have a similar policy-based reason. Cheers. Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speakers of the Sabor

I believe that you created this article. I added the office-holders of the pre-independence era, but for some unknown reasons Sundostund has removed this information. I have asked him why, but he has not given an answer yet. What shall I do? These facts are important. (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2012 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.144.68 (talk)

White Guard (Slovenia) merger

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that I would like to merge the article White Guard (Slovenia) with the MVAC article in case you wanted to take part in the discussion. Thanks --U5K0'sTalk_{Make WikiLove not WikiWar} 22:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Enver Čolaković

I would appriciate your comment here. --Wüstenfuchs 17:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matica crnogorska

The article Matica crnogorska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources independent of topic — notability of topic is not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 14:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrija Anković Memorial Tournament

The article Andrija Anković Memorial Tournament has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robkirwan (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blank location map of the NDH

G'day Thewanderer, I'm currently working my way through FAC with 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian), and the question of some further graphics has cropped up. As the author of File:Handzar.PNG (showing the division's security zone), I wondered if you would have the time to create a blank location map (similar to File:Slovenia location map.svg) covering just the borders of the security zone and perhaps covering as far south as Sokolac, on which I could create red dot locations. All the Bosnia location maps I have found have the current borders and the RS entity divisions on them. Any help you could offer would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poskoci

The article Poskoci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this topic meets notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 22:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ultras Zrinjski

The article Ultras Zrinjski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this topic meets notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 22:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jakljan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian Home Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Election table on Yugoslav coup article

G'day, great idea with the election table. Very important context. Just wondering if you could create a frame around it (or whatever) so the text doesn't butt up against it? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 23:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Graničari stari

The article Graničari stari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Using online sources, I could not find basic facts about the song, except that it was written by one Đuka Galović (b. 1924). In particular, I could not find anything that would establish the song's importance (its author might be notable, though). Unreferenced for 5 years now, full lyrics very likely a copyvio.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregorB (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graničari stari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graničari stari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graničari stari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GregorB (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

G'day Thewanderer, just wanted to invite you to join us at Operation Bora. The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B92 Top 100 Domestic Songs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B92 Top 100 Domestic Songs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B92 Top 100 Domestic Songs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RockyMM (talk • contribs) 11:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of European Company Sport Games 2009

The article European Company Sport Games 2009 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG - no significant coverage in reliable sources could be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregorB (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josip Broz Tito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plitvice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obhođaš and Mark

G'day, I have been unable to locate this text on Google Books or Worldcat. Could you add the isbn or oclc please? It has been raised at GAN. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, I have researched this further, and believe the source is doubtful for a couple of major reasons, scholarship and questionable publishing. I have removed it from the article for that reason. I have explained my reasoning on the article talk page. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 04:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Government of the Democratic Federal Yugoslavia and Yugoslav government-in-exile

Could you help me with these two articles please? I have made a draft templates for the government in exile.Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merging or deleting

There are two articles of identical content but with discrepancies.

I'm contacting you 'cause I've seen you've started one. Articles in question are: Yugoslav Volleyball League & Yugoslav Volleyball Championship

User that edited the other article (because the one who created it is banned) is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matej1234 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.18.62.89 (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canadian-Croatian Folklore Festival

A tag has been placed on Canadian-Croatian Folklore Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

news story

Thank you for writing this with an edit summary that made it possible to screen for the likelihood of these kinds of problems so quickly. And should this matter materialize, we can easily restore the mention. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Istrian exodus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yugoslav and Kolo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Titoist POV

You know the matter and can explain it in Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Manipulated and mystified sources or in talk:Josip Broz Tito#Dispute Teo Pitta (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nogometni-magazin.com

The article Nogometni-magazin.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports website. No secondary sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregorB (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Croatian parliamentary election, 2015. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Your recent editing history at Croatian parliamentary election, 2015 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Tuvixer (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Croatian parliamentary election, 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Thewanderer reported by User:Tuvixer (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrija Anković Memorial Tournament

The article Andrija Anković Memorial Tournament has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable friendly tournament. No indication of GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cisleithanian legislative election, 1907 (Kingdom of Dalmatia)

added a link pointing to Reichsrat

Cisleithanian legislative election, 1907 (Margraviate of Istria)

added a link pointing to Reichsrat

Cisleithanian legislative election, 1911 (Kingdom of Dalmatia)

added a link pointing to Reichsrat

Frane Bulić

added a link pointing to Split

Josip Smodlaka

added a link pointing to Split

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mima Simić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

article on mima simic

i edited the article on mima simic - i added more relevant data as the initial article was fragmentary, misdirected and misfocused, and as such unfair to the subject of the article, misrepresenting her. the subject of the article has been on the croatian cultural "scene" for over a decade and is far better known and recognized as an author, film and media critic and an activist than a member of a former ministry of culture's committee - which the focus of the initial article would lead the reader to believe. also, the initial article implies some sort of a political partisanship or affiliation of the subject, whereas the committee in question was formed of independent experts on the media. see: http://www.min-kulture.hr/default.aspx?id=12344

also, i deleted the inaccurate data, and the bits that seemed biased and to be presenting author's POV rather than the mere facts. e.g. through repeated usage of the adverb "subsequently" (drawing conclusions and "guiding" the reader), or a statement that mima simic is an atheist, although the only basis for this was an article where she (humorously, btw) states that christmas and other religious holidays don't mean much to her. however, nowhere does she declares herself an atheist - so i deleted it. i added that she is a vegan, though, which is probably just as bad - the difference being that she did declare herself a vegan on numerous occasions; even on the fifth day. Gebs013 (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polls 2016 Croatia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling for the next Croatian parliamentary election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Tuvixer (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Opinion polling for the next Croatian parliamentary election.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Tuvixer (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling for the Croatian parliamentary election, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Coalition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thewanderer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VK Jug.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VK Jug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thewanderer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Legislatures of Yugoslavia

Template:Legislatures of Yugoslavia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MontenegroPre-StefanoTreaty.PNG

The file File:MontenegroPre-StefanoTreaty.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Herzegovina location.PNG

The file File:Herzegovina location.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:StonMunicipality.PNG

The file File:StonMunicipality.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UmagMunicipality.PNG

The file File:UmagMunicipality.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SlavonskiSamacMunicipality.PNG

The file File:SlavonskiSamacMunicipality.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HrvatskaKostajnica.PNG

The file File:HrvatskaKostajnica.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Istria County.PNG

The file File:Istria County.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Makarska Municipality (blue).PNG

The file File:Makarska Municipality (blue).PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Federation of BiH parliamentary election, 2010

Template:Federation of BiH parliamentary election, 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Republika Srpska presidential election, 2010

Template:Republika Srpska presidential election, 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Kamen Ingrad's Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NK Kamen Ingrad's Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slagalica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slagalica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Croatian Third League.JPG

The file File:Croatian Third League.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Earthquakes in North Macedonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Earthquakes in North Macedonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nedic's Serbia coat of arms.PNG

The file File:Nedic's Serbia coat of arms.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yugoslavian Government Cabinets

Template:Yugoslavian Government Cabinets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ItsPugle (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Order of King Tomislav recipients has been nominated for listification

Category:Grand Order of King Tomislav recipients has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Medal of the Crown of King Zvonimir has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of the Medal of the Crown of King Zvonimir has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Croatia at the 2006 FIFA World Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Croatia at the 2006 FIFA World Cup, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia at the 2002 FIFA World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grand Order of Queen Jelena recipients has been nominated for listification

Category:Grand Order of Queen Jelena recipients has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Svetinja (Miroslav Škoro album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Svetinja (Miroslav Škoro album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Serbiaetno04.png

Thank you for uploading File:Serbiaetno04.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 13:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Božo Broketa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Božo Broketa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Božo Broketa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 03:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia members

A tag has been placed on Category:Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslav LCY

Hi

I saw that you created the article, Organization of the League of Communists in the Yugoslav People's Army. First, thank you very much for doing so :)

Secondly, I've created several LCY related articles as of late, such as the Central Committee of the 10th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, Secretary of the Presidency of the League of Communists of Macedonia and the Presidency of the 8th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia... I've recently refurbished all league presidency articles and created secretary of the presidency articles for all but Kosovo and the Yugoslav People's Army. The sources are, however, not cooperating with me very much. Do you have access to a source which lists all the national conferences of the LCY of the Army? As you see by following this link I'm pretty stuck here: User:TheUzbek/sandbox4#Yugoslav People's Army.

If you are by any means interested in helping me... Since you come from Bosnia, do you have access to any sources that will fill in the gaps in this Secretary of the Presidency of the League of Communists of Bosnia and Herzegovina article? TheUzbek (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faruk Buljubašić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faruk Buljubašić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faruk Buljubašić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SFRY sidebar

Template:SFRY sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]