User talk:CharlieZeb
Hello CharlieZeb, welcome to Wikipedia.
You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
- You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the Community Portal.
- You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
- Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
- The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.
I've seen some of your work, such as Meadowlands Sports Complex, and I am impressed. You appear to be very knowledgeable about sports in New Jersey. Keep up the good work!
Maximus Rex 02:34, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
NJ Communities
[edit]Thanks for note regarding my contributions. I appreciate it. I'm aware of the problem you indicate. Many communities in New Jersey lack proper articles because of it, simply because they aren't official municipalities. Over time, it's a good bet someone will make them, as you did for Newfoundland. I'm afraid I'm a bit too impatient to track down what township something is really in. Leaving a red link is sometimes good thing, as it alerts people to what needs to be filled in. Agains thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia. -- Decumanus | Talk 06:03, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Your point about leaving red links is well taken. CharlieZeb 13:15, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
I changed it because I didn't think White Sox fans would object to it, but you're right--I'm sure there's a better way to write that. "Often" would work well. Meelar 03:33, 4 May 2004 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback. CharlieZeb 03:39, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
Well, I noted the previously listed game was in the NL, to make the distinction for the AL game I added. MLB is 30 teams, as you noted. MisfitToys 04:06, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments! I've been meaning to write a bit more about Mr. Taylor -- looks like an interesting historical personality, and we definitely need a Taylor Ham article! My hubby grew up Cherry Hill, New Jersey before emigrating to the Left Coast, and talks of Taylor Ham and McMillan's sticky buns with great fondness....
And it's little details like the Waterfront Park outfield wall advertisment that will never show up in Encyclopedia Britannica, but which really do mean something to locals who might come to look at the Taylor Ham article.
And yes, I really only meant to disambiguate John Taylor (Duran Duran) from John Taylor (jazz), and did a bit of Googling, and here I am, the author of articles (or stubs at least) on 26 distinct and interesting JTs from the 1300s to the present day... and have learned a fair bit about British politics, Mormonism, triplets, Trenton history, rugby, and Thames boatmen along the way. Gawd, I love Wikipedia!
Keep up the good work on all the baseball articles, etc. (I miss Mike Piazza....the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes are much more fun to watch than the Dodgers anymore.) Cheers, Catherine - talk 03:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply; I'll have to get on a Taylor ham article. Nothing like Taylor ham, egg and cheese to start a Saturday morning! User:CharlieZeb 19:46, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
Nice article! :) Catherine - talk 03:27, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
Ballparks
[edit]Yes, Charlie, we have talked before, and yes, it was about your Big Baseball Parks page. :) Glad to find you here! Dale Arnett 04:09, 7 May 2004 (UTC) PS: I think splitting the stadiums page up by major and minor leagues was a VERY GOOD idea.
Holman Stadium
[edit]> A friend of mine spoke to someone from your competitor in Manchester, who said, "We're not covering the Pride anymore."
- He neglected to add that they didn't cover the Pride at all until last year, apparently out of fear that they might drain away enough baseball attention to hurt Manchester's minor-league aspirations.
My guess would be the Pride will switch to a short-season league to avoid head-to-head competition ... and/or die completely, of course. As for your query about post-Fisher Cat success, check out the Telegraph's story today http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040510/NEWS01/40510003
You're welcome. RickK 05:21, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)
to avoid editing conflicts i suggest we either alternate innings or stick to one team only. and dont worry about tense or spelling errors. lets get it down and sort that stuff out afterwards. Alkivar 01:11, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- if you want to do it then feel free ... i'll drink a few frosty beverages instead :) and add my 2 cents worth later. Alkivar 01:17, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
fine by me on the Hank Aaron move. Just try to keep the significance of who he is. It's fitting that such a significant player in the history of baseball be at such a significant game. Looks like the Curse Ends/Lunar Eclipse/and almost a completed 4 Game Sweep, what more can a guy ask for :) Alkivar 02:23, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
glad to be of assistance... hey YANKEES ... SUCK MY CURSE! Alkivar 03:48, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you were the last person to edit the Newark Bears article and I was hoping you could help me with a question. Are you familiar at all with Rolando Viera? He played for the Bears in at least their 2003 and 04 seasons, though he is not on the present roster. I know that he was originally signed to the Red Sox and played for their farm teams, but that the Bears are unaffiliated. Does this necessarily mean that the contract ended, or would a MLB team allow a signed player to temporarily play for an unaffiliated team? Do you know what Viera might be doing now? Thanks! Postdlf 00:22, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
John Rutherfurd
[edit]Thanks for the note Charlie. I enjoy writing articles about politicians past and present, and I am glad that you have found one of my articles useful. Academic Challenger 04:23, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
S-5 etc
[edit]I tried emailing this to you, but the email on your site was dead.
How much do you know about the early days of the state highways in Bergen County, specifically 1927-1931? There seems to be a lot of confusion about S-5 (now 93, not S-51 as the SLD and your site says). Specifically, it was defined in 1927 as:
connecting Route No. 5 with Route No. 1 in Ridgefield and Fairview overpassing Northern Railroad at Ridgefield.
http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif shows that 5 was to run with 6 from roughly the connection at Palisades Park to Little Ferry. 1 would have been built along a new alignment north of roughly the county line, coming into Fort Lee separate from 6. S-5 would have been what actually became 1, as well as what actually became S-5, connecting 1 in Fairview to 5/6 on the Ridgefield/Fairview line. However, there's one problem with this - there's no crossing of the Northern Railroad. The bridge on Hendricks Causeway was built around that time, replacing the grade crossing on pre-1927 10, but that doesn't make sense as part of a through S-5. It's possible that the legislature intended for all of old 10 to become 5, and S-5 would head over the new bridge and end at Hendricks Causeway and Edgewater Avenue. That still doesn't make much sense though, as they'd want to reroute 5 over the new bridge. Are there any state highway markings on the bridge?
Then in 1929, 5 was truncated to Ridgefield-Edgewater, and the text about the railroad overpass was removed from S-5. There is still a problem though - S-5 no longer intersected 5, but that could just have been an error.
Thanks for any help. --SPUI (talk | don't use sorted stub templates!) 08:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Madison Square Garden
[edit]Hi, since you have written on the Madison Square Garden Talk page before, I want to know if you can comment on the current debate on whether a sentence I wrote, about WWE blocking WCW from ever having a show in the garden, belongs in the article. My opinion is that the fact is as important to MSG history as it was to the WWE. Milchama 10:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
File:Njmap-0201.png listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Njmap-0201.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Njmap-0202.png listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Njmap-0202.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Yereance-Berry house 1938.jpg
[edit]File:Yereance-Berry house 1938.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Yereance-Berry house 1938.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Yereance-Berry house 1938.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Njmap-0203.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Njmap-0203.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Go ahead, delete it. This file and the other 55 I created in 2005 have apparently all been replaced by other images, and a few have already been deleted. CharlieZeb (talk) 03:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The Sandcastle
[edit]Hello. Please note that the link on your user page to "The Sandcastle" is out of date. The stadium was renamed in 2006, and the novel is now the primary topic with that name. The article about the stadium is now at Bernie Robbins Stadium (and there is currently a pending move request suggesting to move the article to "Surf Stadium"). —BarrelProof (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, CharlieZeb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, CharlieZeb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CharlieZeb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Njmap-0221.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 01:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Njmap-0222.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 01:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CharlieZeb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)