Talk:St Pancras railway station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the St Pancras railway station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

St Pancras railway station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

St Pancras railway station is part of the London station group series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 17, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
August 7, 2019	Good topic candidate	Promoted
October 15, 2018	Peer review	Reviewed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 1, 2018, and October 1, 2021.
Current status: Good article

Trains: Stations / in UK / in London Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 8, 2018

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as High-importance).

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

For details on why this article is currently named St Pancras railway station, see Talk:St Pancras railway station/Naming.

Archives

St. Pancras Clock Tower

I would like to find out its height as well as its neighbouring one built at the Kings Cross Railway Station height. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhippetWild (talk • contribs) 15:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

dates missing

no date in lede noted and added. User removed content with passive aggressive edit summary. also removed appropriate tags User appears to WP:OWN page ? I reverted unconstructive edit.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to just about anywhere in the St Pancras concourse (it’s celebrating an anniversary right now with big posters and displays everywhere) or read any of the book sources given, you will find the information you are looking for. If you’d started the discussion here with something like “I don’t understand when exactly the station was built - some time in the 1860s? Why haven’t we cited the Act of Parliament?” I might have been more sympathetic, but since you’ve not demonstrated any interest in the station, I’m not minded to listen. OWN does not mean “let anyone put any edits in even if they make the article worse for the reader”. User:Beyond My Ken/thoughts#Tags has the best explanation. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 07:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you are edit warring nothing else. and Wp oWNING --Wuerzele (talk) 21:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. The level of tagging was ludicrous and appeared to be hostile. This is supposed to be a collaborative project. I wouldn't quote WP:OWN at people like that in this circumstance. Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, the prose sets the timeline by citing the 1863 Act of Parliament, describes the construction methods (which, kind of by definition are a continuous activity), then cites the 1868 opening date. Specific dates won't help the reader, unless they're something like "this part of the project took 18 months". Of course, if you can't have a conversation about the topic and material, but just hurl random policies and insults, you'll never get what you want. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

KingsCrossDevelopmentModel.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – it's gone now. Nuthin' to see here. DBaK (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name change to St Pancras International

As the article says, the station has been known officially as London St Pancras International for quite a while now. It is referred to as such on a lot of things (e.g. Thameslink announcements, TfL maps and signage). I see no reason why the article shouldn't be renamed to St Pancras International Railway Station. Bobster1001 (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still think St Pancras better meets WP:COMMONNAME - whilst officially I agree it's now been St Pancras International since 2007, the majority of coverage from reliable sources ([1] [2] for two examples within the last week) still refers to St Pancras, without the 'International' suffix. Mike1901 (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. In general use I've always heard it referred to as St Pancras so I suppose it's the best name for it. Bobster1001 (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Services merged together?

Could the services, domestic services, international services and service pattern sections be merged into one? There's a lot of information that appears to be repeated over multiple areas. I could do it now however I'm not sure if it's like that for a reason. Bobster1001 (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, the plain "Services" section could easily be made redundant by having its content moved to the relevant sections (the first paragraph really should remain where it is and have its heading renamed to "Platform layout" - consistency across other station articles). The other parts should be moved to the relevant sections later. Happy to hear the thoughts of other editors though. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree. The services section seems a bit pointless considering there's already domestic and international services sections Bobster1001 (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]