Talk:Psychocandy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference ideas for Psychocandy

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Fair use rationale for Image:Psychocandy.jpg

Image:Psychocandy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the most boring album I have ever heard.

And I listen to a lot of music, but this album is just white noise mistaken as music. Avoid! - 211.30.231.112 11:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're entitled to your opinion, but this page is for discussion of the article, not dicussion of the album that the article is about. -Dayv (talk) 21:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Production problems

I wonder if the album had production problems? Every time I listen to the album I am less than impressed by the softness of the music. It is as though someone turned it down. Does anyone else have the same problem? --One Salient Oversight (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Loudness war 62.77.181.13 (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article, anyone?

Since this album is A) great and B) at #269 on this list, I'm planning to attempt to take this to WP:GA status in the near future. If anyone wants to join in, that would be magic. Thanks! — sparklism ^hey! 13:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]